9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endotracheal intubation skills of pediatricians versus anesthetists in neonates and children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study compares the performance of pediatricians and anesthetists in neonatal and pediatric endotracheal intubations (ETI) during simulated settings. Participants completed a questionnaire and performed an ETI scenario on a neonatal and a child manikin. The procedures were recorded with head cameras and cameras attached to standard laryngoscope blades. The outcomes were successful intubation, time to successful intubation, number of attempts, complications, total performance score, end-assessment rating, and an assessment whether the participant was sufficiently able to perform an ETI. Fifty-two pediatricians and 52 anesthetists were included. For the neonatal ETI, the rate of successful intubation was in favor of anesthetists although not significant. Anesthetists performed significantly better in all other outcomes. Of the pediatricians, 65% was rated sufficiently adept to perform a neonatal ETI vs 100% of the anesthetists. Pediatricians (29%) overestimated while anesthetists (33%) underestimated their performance in neonatal ETI. For the pediatric ETI, all outcomes were significantly better for anesthetists. Only 15% of all pediatricians were considered sufficiently able to perform pediatric ETI vs 94% of the anesthetists.

          Conclusion: Anesthetists are far more adept in performing ETI in neonates and children compared with pediatricians in a simulated setting. Complications are expected to occur less frequently and less seriously when anesthetists perform ETI.

          What is Known:

          Endotracheal intubation (ETI) performed by inexperienced care providers can lead to unsuccessful and/or prolonged intubation attempts. This can cause complications such as hypoxemia, trauma to the oropharynx and larynx, and prolonged interruption of resuscitation, which results in a high morbidity/mortality.

          Fifty to 60 real-life ETI procedures are needed before ETI can be performed with a 90% success rate. Despite this, 18% of providers still require some assistance even after performing 80 intubations. Skill fade will occur if there is too little exposure.

          What is New:

          This study shows that, on both neonatal and child manikins, anesthetists perform better in ETI compared with pediatricians. Besides this, complications are expected to occur less frequently and less seriously when anesthetists are performing the ETIs on neonates and children.

          In those countries where there are no clear interprofessional agreements made in general hospitals on who will perform ETI on neonates and children in acute care settings, these agreements are urgently necessary.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s00431-019-03395-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

          The goal of therapy for bradycardia or tachycardia is to rapidly identify and treat patients who are hemodynamically unstable or symptomatic due to the arrhythmia. Drugs or, when appropriate, pacing may be used to control unstable or symptomatic bradycardia. Cardioversion or drugs or both may be used to control unstable or symptomatic tachycardia. ACLS providers should closely monitor stable patients pending expert consultation and should be prepared to aggressively treat those with evidence of decompensation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects.

            Endotracheal intubation of newborn infants is a mandatory competence for many pediatric trainees. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommends a 20-second limit for intubation attempts. Intubation attempts by junior doctors are frequently unsuccessful, and many infants are intubated between 20 and 30 seconds without apparent adverse effect. Little is known about the proficiency of more senior medical staff, the time taken to determine endotracheal tube (ETT) position, or the effects of attempted intubation on infants' heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (Spo2) in the delivery room (DR). The objectives of this study were to determine (1) the success rates and duration of intubation attempts during DR resuscitation, (2) whether experience is associated with greater success rates and shorter time taken to intubate, (3) the time taken to identify ETT position after intubation, and (4) the frequency with which infants deteriorated during intubation attempts and the time at which this occurred. We reviewed videos of DR resuscitations; identified whether intubation was attempted; and, when attempted, whether intubation was attempted by a resident, a fellow, or a consultant. We defined the duration of an intubation attempt as the time from the introduction of the laryngoscope blade to the mouth to its removal, regardless of whether an ETT was introduced. We determined the time from removal of the laryngoscope to the clinicians' decision as to whether the intubation was successful and noted the basis on which this decision was made (clinical assessment, flow signals, or exhaled carbon dioxide [ETCO2] detection). We determined success according to clinical signs in all cases and used flow signals that were obtained during ventilation via the ETT or ETCO2 when available. When neither was available, the chest radiograph on admission to the NICU was reviewed. For infants who were monitored with pulse oximetry, we determined their HR and Spo2 before the intubation attempt. We then determined whether either or both fell by > or =10% during the attempt and, if so, at what time it occurred. We reviewed 122 video recordings in which orotracheal intubation was attempted 60 times in 31 infants. We secondarily verified ETT position using flow signals, ETCO2, or chest radiographs after 94% of attempts in which an ETT was introduced. Thirty-seven (62%) attempts were successful. Success rates and mean (SD) time to intubate successfully by group were as follows: residents: 24%, 49 seconds (13 seconds); fellows: 78%, 32 seconds (13 seconds); and consultants: 86%, 25 seconds (17 seconds). Of the 23 unsuccessful attempts, 13 were abandoned without an attempt to pass an ETT and 10 were placed incorrectly. The time to determine ETT position in the DR was longer when clinical assessment alone was used. Infants who were monitored with oximetry deteriorated during nearly half of the intubation attempts. Deterioration seemed more likely when HR and Spo2 were low before the attempt. Intubation attempts often are unsuccessful, and successful attempts frequently take >30 seconds. Greater experience is associated with greater success rates and shorter duration of successful attempts. Flow signals and ETCO2 may be useful in determining ETT position more quickly than clinical assessment alone. Infants frequently deteriorate during intubation attempts. Improved monitoring of infants who are resuscitated in the DR is desirable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis.

              Despite the established vulnerability of children during airway management, remarkably little is known about complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation. To address this concern, we developed a multicentre registry (Pediatric Difficult Intubation [PeDI]) to characterise risk factors for difficult tracheal intubation, establish the success rates of various tracheal intubation techniques, catalogue the complications of children with difficult tracheal intubation, and establish the effect of more than two tracheal intubation attempts on complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31 43 387 52 45 , vansambeeck@gmail.com
                sander.van.kuijk@mumc.nl
                b.kramer@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                petronella.vermeulen@mumc.nl
                gijs.vos@hotmail.com
                Journal
                Eur J Pediatr
                Eur. J. Pediatr
                European Journal of Pediatrics
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-6199
                1432-1076
                8 June 2019
                8 June 2019
                2019
                : 178
                : 8
                : 1219-1227
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department of Pediatrics, , Maastricht University Medical Centre, ; P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, , Maastricht University Medical Centre, ; P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0480 1382, GRID grid.412966.e, Department of Anesthesiology, , Maastricht University Medical Centre, ; P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
                Author notes

                Communicated by Piet Leroy

                Article
                3395
                10.1007/s00431-019-03395-8
                6647518
                31177289
                3c38f1f5-6bec-4ca0-acc8-b60172ef3a98
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 15 November 2018
                : 5 March 2019
                : 30 April 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Maastricht University Medical Center (UMC+)
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

                Pediatrics
                child,infant,newborn,endotracheal intubation,general hospitals
                Pediatrics
                child, infant, newborn, endotracheal intubation, general hospitals

                Comments

                Comment on this article