6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Variation in the Standard Deviation of the Lure Rating Distribution: Implications for Estimates of Recollection Probability

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In word recognition semantic priming of test words increased the false-alarm rate and the mean of confidence ratings to lures. Such priming also increased the standard deviation of confidence ratings to lures and the slope of the z-ROC function, suggesting that the priming increased the standard deviation of the lure evidence distribution. The Unequal Variance Signal Detection (UVSD) model interpreted the priming as increasing the standard deviation of the lure evidence distribution. Without additional parameters the Dual Process Signal Detection (DPSD) model could only accommodate the results by fitting the data for related and unrelated primes separately, interpreting the priming, implausibly, as decreasing the probability of target recollection (DPSD). With an additional parameter, for the probability of false (lure) recollection the model could fit the data for related and unrelated primes together, interpreting the priming as increasing the probability of false recollection. These results suggest that DPSD estimates of target recollection probability will decrease with increases in the lure confidence/evidence standard deviation unless a parameter is included for false recollection. Unfortunately the size of a given lure confidence/evidence standard deviation relative to other possible lure confidence/evidence standard deviations is often unspecified by context. Hence the model often has no way of estimating false recollection probability and thereby correcting its estimates of target recollection probability.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          9502924
          21568
          Psychon Bull Rev
          Psychon Bull Rev
          Psychonomic bulletin & review
          1069-9384
          1531-5320
          4 February 2017
          October 2017
          01 October 2018
          : 24
          : 5
          : 1658-1664
          Affiliations
          George Washington University
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to: Stephen Dopkins, Psychology Department, The George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20052, voice: 202-994-6315, fax: 202-994-1602, dopkins@ 123456gwu.edu

          Kaitlin Varner., Darin Hoyer, Psychology Department, The George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20052

          Article
          PMC5534381 PMC5534381 5534381 nihpa847928
          10.3758/s13423-017-1232-9
          5534381
          28138833
          3c4fc8d5-a8b0-49b8-95d1-16b31b100d66
          History
          Categories
          Article

          familiarity,dual process signal detection,unequal variance signal detection,ROC curve,recollection

          Comments

          Comment on this article