1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine extended-release formulation in Japanese patients with bipolar depression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rationale

          Quetiapine fumarate is an atypical antipsychotic indicated for various mental disorders, but it has not been studied in Japanese patients with bipolar depression.

          Objectives

          To evaluate the efficacy and safety of quetiapine XR (extended release) in Japanese patients with bipolar depression.

          Methods

          In this multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study of 431 Japanese adults with bipolar I or II disorder, efficacy was determined by analyzing the mean change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Secondary end points included MADRS response and remission rates, Hamilton Depression Scale 17-Item (HAM-D 17), and Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar (CGI-BP) scale scores. Safety was determined by monitoring adverse events and clinical assessments.

          Results

          This study revealed a statistically significantly greater decrease in MADRS total score after 8 weeks of quetiapine XR 300 mg/day monotherapy compared with placebo (− 12.6 vs. − 10.1; p = 0.034). There were also improvements in MADRS response (44.1 vs. 35.6%) and remission (38.0 vs. 26.6%) rates as well as in HAM-D 17 and CGI-BP scale scores compared with placebo. In the subgroup analysis of patients with bipolar I or II disorder, the adjusted mean changes in MADRS total score compared to placebo were − 2.3 and − 2.1, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 149 patients (83.2%) receiving quetiapine XR 300 mg/day and in 81 patients (45.8%) receiving placebo. The most common adverse events were somnolence and thirst, which is consistent with the previously reported safety profile.

          Conclusions

          Once-daily monotherapy with quetiapine XR is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bipolar depression in Japanese patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression.

          There is a major unmet need for effective options in the treatment of bipolar depression. Five hundred forty-two outpatients with bipolar I (N=360) or II (N=182) disorder experiencing a major depressive episode (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of quetiapine (600 or 300 mg/day) or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to week 8 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. Additional efficacy assessments included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression of severity and improvement, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Quetiapine at either dose demonstrated statistically significant improvement in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total scores compared with placebo from week 1 onward. The proportions of patients meeting response criteria (> or =50% Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score improvement) at the final assessment in the groups taking 600 and 300 mg/day of quetiapine were 58.2% and 57.6%, respectively, versus 36.1% for placebo. The proportions of patients meeting remission criteria (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale < or =12) were 52.9% in the groups taking 600 and 300 mg/day of quetiapine versus 28.4% for placebo. Quetiapine at 600 and 300 mg/day significantly improved 9 of 10 and 8 of 10 Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale items, respectively, compared to placebo, including the core symptoms of depression. Treatment-emergent mania rates were low and similar for the quetiapine and placebo groups (3.2% and 3.9%, respectively). Quetiapine monotherapy is efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of bipolar depression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of quetiapine monotherapy in bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study (the BOLDER II study).

            This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine monotherapy for depressive episodes in patients with bipolar I or II disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) who were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine (300 or 600 mg/d; once daily, evening dosing) or placebo. Patients were assessed weekly using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The primary end point was change in MADRS total score from baseline to Week 8 (analysis of covariance/last-observation-carried-forward analysis). Of 509 patients randomized, 59% completed the study. Improvements from baseline in mean MADRS total scores were significantly greater with quetiapine 300 and 600 mg/d than with placebo from first evaluation (Week 1) through Week 8 (both P
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Biological Treatment of Bipolar Disorders: Update 2010 on the treatment of acute bipolar depression.

              These guidelines are based on a first edition that was published in 2002, and have been edited and updated with the available scientific evidence until September 2009. Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of acute bipolar depression in adults. The data used for these guidelines have been extracted from a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, from the clinical trial database clinicaltrials.gov, from recent proceedings of key conferences, and from various national and international treatment guidelines. Their scientific rigor was categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F). As these guidelines are intended for clinical use, the scientific evidence was finally assigned different grades of recommendation to ensure practicability. We identified 10 pharmacological monotherapies or combination treatments with at least limited positive evidence for efficacy in bipolar depression, several of them still experimental and backed up only by a single study. Only one medication was considered to be sufficiently studied to merit full positive evidence. Although major advances have been made since the first edition of this guideline in 2002, there are many areas which still need more intense research to optimize treatment. The majority of treatment recommendations is still based on limited data and leaves considerable areas of uncertainty.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                murasaki@i-cnsp.com
                koyama@ohyachi-hp.or.jp
                skanba@npsych.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
                takeuchim@pharm.kitasato-u.ac.jp
                yuriko.shimizu@astellas.com
                eri.arita@astellas.com
                kentarou.kuroishi@astellas.com
                masahiro-takeuchi@astellas.com
                +81-3-3244-2606 , shinya.kamei@astellas.com
                Journal
                Psychopharmacology (Berl)
                Psychopharmacology (Berl.)
                Psychopharmacology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0033-3158
                1432-2072
                1 August 2018
                1 August 2018
                2018
                : 235
                : 10
                : 2859-2869
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of CNS Pharmacology, 3-14-20 Sagamiohno, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0303 Japan
                [2 ]Ohyachi Hospital, Clinical Research Center, 5-7-10 Ohyachi-higashi, Atsubetsu-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 004-0041 Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2242 4849, GRID grid.177174.3, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, , Kyushu University, ; 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9206 2938, GRID grid.410786.c, Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Pharmacy, , Kitasato University, ; 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641 Japan
                [5 ]GRID grid.418042.b, Japan/Asia Clinical Development 2, Astellas Pharma Inc., ; Astellas Pharma Inc.; 2-5-1 Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8411 Japan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1793 4635, GRID grid.476166.4, Global Clinical Science, Astellas Pharma Europe B.V, ; Sylviusweg 62, PO Box 344, 2300 AH Leiden, The Netherlands
                [7 ]GRID grid.418042.b, Japan-Asia Data Science, Astellas Pharma Inc., ; 2-5-1 Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8411 Japan
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0507 1326, GRID grid.423286.9, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., ; 1 Astellas Way, Northbrook, IL 60062 USA
                Article
                4977
                10.1007/s00213-018-4977-6
                6182597
                30069587
                3c51786e-f140-49d0-8da3-5cd30daf0e96
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 31 January 2018
                : 17 July 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002975, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma;
                Funded by: Janssen Phrma (Jp)
                Funded by: Nippon Chemiphar
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004820, Mochida Pharmaceutical Company;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003769, Eisai;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010793, Pfizer Japan;
                Funded by: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma (Jp)
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004169, Meiji Seika Pharma;
                Funded by: Yoshitomiyakuhin (Jp)
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005612, Shionogi;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004948, Astellas Pharma;
                Categories
                Original Investigation
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                atypical antipsychotics,quetiapine xr,bipolar disorder,depression,madrs

                Comments

                Comment on this article