1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Introducing radiology report checklists among residents: adherence rates when suggesting versus requiring their use and early experience in improving accuracy.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To retrospectively compare resident adherence to checklist-style structured reporting for maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) from the emergency department (when required vs. suggested between two programs). To compare radiology resident reporting accuracy before and after introduction of the structured report and assess its ability to decrease the rate of undetected pathology.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Acad Radiol
          Academic radiology
          Elsevier BV
          1878-4046
          1076-6332
          Mar 2014
          : 21
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, First Ave at 16th St, 2K-01, New York City, NY 10003. Electronic address: dpowell@chpnet.org.
          [2 ] Department of Radiology, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York City, NY.
          [3 ] Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, First Ave at 16th St, 2K-01, New York City, NY 10003.
          Article
          S1076-6332(13)00577-1
          10.1016/j.acra.2013.12.004
          24507429
          3c5e6efd-c5a4-4f21-b44b-502f3c8d68b7
          History

          resident education,resident accuracy,radiology reporting,quality improvement,Structured reporting,safety,checklists

          Comments

          Comment on this article