41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The increasing prevalence of chronic disease faced by both developed and developing countries is of considerable concern to a number of international organisations. Many of the interventions to address this concern within primary healthcare settings are based on the chronic care model (CCM). The implementation of complex interventions such as CCMs requires careful consideration and planning. Success depends on a number of factors at the healthcare provider, team, organisation and system levels.

          Methods

          The aim of this systematic review was to systematically examine the scientific literature in order to understand the facilitators and barriers to implementing CCMs within a primary healthcare setting. This review focused on both quantitative and qualitative studies which included patients with chronic disease (cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic respiratory disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression and HIV/AIDS) receiving care in primary healthcare settings, as well as primary healthcare providers such as doctors, nurses and administrators. Papers were limited to those published in English between 1998 and 2013.

          Results

          The search returned 3492 articles. The majority of these studies were subsequently excluded based on their title or abstract because they clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria for this review. A total of 226 full text articles were obtained and a further 188 were excluded as they did not meet the criteria. Thirty eight published peer-reviewed articles were ultimately included in this review. Five primary themes emerged. In addition to ensuring appropriate resources to support implementation and sustainability, the acceptability of the intervention for both patients and healthcare providers contributed to the success of the intervention. There was also a need to prepare healthcare providers for the implementation of a CCM, and to support patients as the way in which they receive care changes.

          Conclusion

          This systematic review demonstrated the importance of considering human factors including the influence that different stakeholders have on the success or otherwise of the implementing a CCM.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0319-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart1

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patient perceptions of the quality of health services.

              As calls are made for a more patient-centered health care system, it becomes critical to define and measure patient perceptions of health care quality and to understand more fully what drives those perceptions. This chapter identifies conceptual and methodological issues that make this task difficult, including the confusion between patient perceptions and patient satisfaction and the difficulty of determining whether systematic variations in patient perceptions should be attributed to differences in expectations or actual experiences. We propose a conceptual model to help unravel these knotty issues; review qualitative studies that report directly from patients on how they define quality; provide an overview of how health plans, hospitals, physicians, and health care in general are currently viewed by patients; assess whether and how patient health status and demographic characteristics relate to perceptions of health care quality; and identify where further, or more appropriately designed, research is needed. Our aim is to find out what patients want, need and experience in health care, not what professionals (however well-motivated) believe they need or get.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                carol.davy@sahmri.com
                j.bleasel@neura.edu.au
                hliu@georgeinstitute.org.au
                mtchan@georgeinstitute.org.au
                sponniah@au.pwc.com
                alex.brown@sahmri.com
                Journal
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Family Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2296
                19 August 2015
                19 August 2015
                2015
                : 16
                : 102
                Affiliations
                [ ]South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [ ]The George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales Australia
                Article
                319
                10.1186/s12875-015-0319-5
                4545323
                26286614
                3c66147d-a955-4a19-8464-ced49650b027
                © Davy et al. 2015

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 12 March 2015
                : 7 August 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article