4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bio-electrosynthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate and surfactants in microbial fuel cells: a preliminary study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Microbial Electrochemical Technology (MET) offers a promising avenue for CO 2 utilization by leveraging the ability of chemolithotrophic microorganisms to use inorganic carbon in biosynthetic processes. By harnessing the power of electroactive bacteria, METs can facilitate the conversion of inorganic carbon into organic compounds. Therefore, this work combines biosurfactant production at the anode and PHB production at the cathode of Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs), while testing the efficiency of Microbial Electrosynthesis Cells (MECs), and traditional culture in liquid media. This study employed a consortium of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA1430/CO1 and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, to provide reducing equivalents to Cupriavidus necator DSM428 for CO 2 fixation and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production. Glycerol was used as a carbon source by the anode consortium to investigate biosurfactant production. Additionally, Adaptive Laboratory Evolution (ALE) was employed to enhance the efficiency of this process to develop biofilms capable of synthesizing PHB from CO 2 in MFCs under a controlled gas atmosphere (10% CO 2, 10% O 2, 2% H 2, 78% N 2). Observed results showed a higher direct CO 2 removal from the gas mix in MECs (73%) than in MFCs (65%) compared to control cultures. Anionic (18.8 mg/L) and non-ionic (14.6 mg/L) surfactants were primarily present at the anodes of MFCs. Confocal microscope analysis revealed that the accumulation of PHBs in C. necator was significantly higher in MFCs (73% of cell volume) rather than in MECs (23%) and control cultures (40%). Further analyses on metabolites in the different systems are ongoing. Our data gave evidence that the anode consortium was able to provide enough electrons to sustain the chemolithotrophic growth of C. necator and the biosynthesis of PHBs at the cathode of MFCs, in a mechanism suggestive of the direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET), naturally occurring in natural environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Glycerol from biodiesel production: Technological paths for sustainability

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Biosurfactants: Production, properties, applications, trends, and general perspectives

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Adaptive laboratory evolution principles and applications in industrial biotechnology

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1699360/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/268918/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1956720/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1909251/overviewRole: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/83507/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Microbiol
                Front Microbiol
                Front. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-302X
                25 February 2025
                2025
                : 16
                : 1372302
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Laboratory of Microbiology and Biochemistry, Department of Science and Technology, University of Naples “Parthenope” , Naples, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Biotechnology, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research , Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
                [3] 3Analitics Chemistry for the Environment Laboratory (ACE), CESMA, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II” , Naples, Italy
                [4] 4Laboratoire Ampere CNRS UMR 5005, Université de Lyon, UCBL, INSA, ECL , Villeurbanne, France
                [5] 5Laboratory of Systems Microbiology, Department of Microbial Sciences, University of Surrey , Guildford, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Stephane Guillouet, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse (INSA), France

                Reviewed by: Sirasit Srinuanpan, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

                Argyro Tsipa, University of Cyprus, Cyprus

                Yolanda Reyes-Vidal, Center of Research and Technologic Development in Electrochemistry, Mexico

                *Correspondence: Rosa Anna Nastro, rosa.nastro@ 123456uniparthenope.it
                Article
                10.3389/fmicb.2025.1372302
                11895702
                40071206
                3c96a3e2-5543-44be-81fd-5f1e1d354305
                Copyright © 2025 Nastro, Kuppam, Toscanesi, Trifuoggi, Pietrelli, Pasquale and Avignone-Rossa.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 January 2024
                : 29 January 2025
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Equations: 5, References: 75, Pages: 19, Words: 14325
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This publication was based upon the work from COST Action CA-19123 - Protection, Resilience, Rehabilitation of damaged environment (PHOENIX), supported by COST (Europan Cooperation in Science and Technology). This research was supported by a C1NET BBSRC Proof of Concept Grant, the Italian Ministry for the University and the Research (PON Ricerca e Innovazione “Istruzione e Ricerca per il recupero – REACT-EU”- CUP: I65F21001100001). CA-R was partially funded by EU-Grant GREENER (European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme Grant Agreement No. 826312).
                Categories
                Microbiology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Microbiotechnology

                Microbiology & Virology
                cupravidus necator dsm 428,phbs electrosynthesis,pseudomonas aeruginosa pa1430/co1,shewanella oneidensis-mr1,bioelectrochemical systems,co2 capture,biosurfactants

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log