50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Redundant sensory information does not enhance sequence learning in the serial reaction time task

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In daily life we encounter multiple sources of sensory information at any given moment. Unknown is whether such sensory redundancy in some way affects implicit learning of a sequence of events. In the current paper we explored this issue in a serial reaction time task. Our results indicate that redundant sensory information does not enhance sequence learning when all sensory information is presented at the same location (responding to the position and/or color of the stimuli; Experiment 1), even when the distinct sensory sources provide more or less similar baseline response latencies (responding to the shape and/or color of the stimuli; Experiment 2). These findings support the claim that sequence learning does not (necessarily) benefit from sensory redundancy. Moreover, transfer was observed between various sets of stimuli, indicating that learning was predominantly response-based.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Task switching.

          Everyday life requires frequent shifts between cognitive tasks. Research reviewed in this article probes the control processes that reconfigure mental resources for a change of task by requiring subjects to switch frequently among a small set of simple tasks. Subjects' responses are substantially slower and, usually, more error-prone immediately after a task switch. This 'switch cost' is reduced, but not eliminated, by an opportunity for preparation. It seems to result from both transient and long-term carry-over of 'task-set' activation and inhibition as well as time consumed by task-set reconfiguration processes. Neuroimaging studies of task switching have revealed extra activation in numerous brain regions when subjects prepare to change tasks and when they perform a changed task, but we cannot yet separate 'controlling' from 'controlled' regions.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure.

            Can we learn without awareness? Although this issue has been extensively explored through studies of implicit learning, there is currently no agreement about the extent to which knowledge can be acquired and projected onto performance in an unconscious way. The controversy, like that surrounding implicit memory, seems to be at least in part attributable to unquestioned acceptance of the unrealistic assumption that tasks are process-pure--that is, that a given task exclusively involves either implicit or explicit knowledge. Methods such as the process dissociation procedure (PDP, Jacoby, 1991) have been developed to overcome the conceptual limitations of the process purity assumption but have seldom been used in the context of implicit learning research. In this paper, we show how the PDP can be applied to a free generation task so as to disentangle explicit and implicit sequence learning. Our results indicate that subjects who are denied preparation to the next stimulus nevertheless exhibit knowledge of the sequence through their reaction time performance despite remaining unable (1) to project this knowledge in a recognition task and (2) to refrain from expressing their knowledge when specifically instructed to do so. These findings provide strong evidence that sequence learning can be unconscious.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

              The authors theorize that 2 neurocognitive sequence-learning systems can be distinguished in serial reaction time experiments, one dorsal (parietal and supplementary motor cortex) and the other ventral (temporal and lateral prefrontal cortex). Dorsal system learning is implicit and associates noncategorized stimuli within dimensional modules. Ventral system learning can be implicit or explicit It also allows associating events across dimensions and therefore is the basis of cross-task integration or interference, depending on degree of cross-task correlation of signals. Accordingly, lack of correlation rather than limited capacity is responsible for dual-task effects on learning. The theory is relevant to issues of attentional effects on learning; the representational basis of complex, sequential skills; hippocampal-versus basal ganglia-based learning; procedural versus declarative memory; and implicit versus explicit memory.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Adv Cogn Psychol
                Adv Cogn Psychol
                acp
                Advances in Cognitive Psychology
                University of Finance and Management in Warsaw
                1895-1171
                1 March 2012
                2012
                : 8
                : 2
                : 109-120
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
                [2 ]Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Elger L. Abrahamse, Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Ghent, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Tel.: +32 92 64 86 57. E-mail: elger.abrahamse@ 123456ugent.be
                Article
                10.2478/v10053-008-0108-y
                3367906
                22679466
                3ca22ed4-c2f0-456a-804d-553b0e01f1e3
                Copyright: © 2012 University of Finance and Management in Warsaw

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 September 2010
                : 19 November 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                implicit learning,sequence learning,serial reaction time task,sensory redundancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log