19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Radiotherapy Combined With Pembrolizumab on Local Tumor Control in Mucosal Melanoma Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: Mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor response to conventional therapies. The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT), especially combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), for this rare melanoma subtype remains unknown. We investigated the reciprocal effect of RT and ICI on mucosal melanoma patients.

          Materials and Methods: We identified 23 patients with 31 tumors who were treated with RT between July 2008 and February 2017. All patients received RT for primary or metastatic gross tumor mass with a median dose of 4 Gy per fraction (range 1.8–12 Gy). Eleven patients (14 lesions) were treated with RT alone, whereas 12 (17 lesions) were administered pembrolizumab combined with RT (ICI+RT group). The local control (LC) and adverse event (AE) rates were compared between the groups. Eight patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma treated with ICI alone during the same study period were included as a comparison group.

          Results: The median follow-up period was 17.4 (range 3.7–95.2) months. The target lesion control rate at 1-year was significantly higher in the ICI+RT group than in the RT-alone group or ICI-alone group (94.1% vs. 57.1% vs. 25%; P < 0.05). No abscopal effect was observed in our cohort. Treatment-related AEs were not significantly increased in the combined treatment group compared with the RT-alone group ( P > 0.05). No grade ≥3 AEs occurred in the ICI+RT group.

          Conclusions: Besides RT acting as an immune adjuvant, ICI might have a radiosensitizing effect and may increase LC without severe toxicity. We have initiated a phase II study to determine the effects of RT in patients with melanoma undergoing anti-PD1 (NCT04017897).

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

          This study reviews the case-mix characteristics, management, and outcomes of melanoma cases occuring in the U.S. within the last decade. Analyses of the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) were performed on cases diagnosed between 1985 through 1994. A total of 84,836 cases comprised of cutaneous and noncutaneous melanomas were evaluated. The percentages of melanomas that were cutaneous, ocular, mucosal, and unknown primaries were 91.2%, 5.2%, 1.3%, and 2.2%, respectively. For cutaneous melanomas, the proportion of patients presenting with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stages 0, I, II, III, and IV were 14.9%, 47.7%, 23.1%, 8.9%, and 5.3%, respectively. Factors associated with decreased survival included more advanced stage at diagnosis, nodular or acral lentiginous histology, increased age, male gender, nonwhite race, and lower income. Multivariate analysis identified stage, histology, gender, age, and income as independent prognostic factors. For ocular melanomas, 85.0% were uveal, 4.8% were conjunctival, and 10.2% occurred at other sites. During the study period, there was a large increase in the proportion of ocular melanoma patients treated with radiation therapy alone. For mucosal melanomas, the distribution of head and neck, female genital tract, anal/rectal, and urinary tract sites was 55.4%, 18.0%, 23.8%, and 2.8%, respectively. Patients with lymph node involvement had a poor prognosis. For unknown primary melanomas, the distribution of metastases as localized to a region or multiple sites at presentation was 43.0% and 57.0%, respectively. Surgical treatment of patients with unknown primary site of the melanoma resulted in better survival compared with no treatment. Treatment of early stage cutaneous melanoma resulted in excellent patient outcomes. In addition to conventional prognostic factors, socioeconomic factors were found to be associated with survival.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Mucosal Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis.

            Purpose Mucosal melanoma is an aggressive malignancy with a poor response to conventional therapies. The efficacy and safety of nivolumab (a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor), alone or combined with ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 checkpoint inhibitor), have not been reported in this rare melanoma subtype. Patients and Methods Data were pooled from 889 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy in clinical studies, including phase III trials; 86 (10%) had mucosal melanoma and 665 (75%) had cutaneous melanoma. Data were also pooled for patients who received nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (n = 35, mucosal melanoma; n = 326, cutaneous melanoma). Results Among patients who received nivolumab monotherapy, median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.2 to 5.4 months) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 23.3% (95% CI, 14.8% to 33.6%) and 40.9% (95% CI, 37.1% to 44.7%), respectively. Median progression-free survival in patients treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 16.7 months) for mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, with objective response rates of 37.1% (95% CI, 21.5% to 55.1%) and 60.4% (95% CI, 54.9% to 65.8%), respectively. For mucosal and cutaneous melanoma, respectively, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 8.1% and 12.5% for nivolumab monotherapy and 40.0% and 54.9% for combination therapy. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of data for anti-programmed death-1 therapy in mucosal melanoma to date. Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab seemed to have greater efficacy than either agent alone, and although the activity was lower in mucosal melanoma, the safety profile was similar between subtypes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Time to abandon single-site irradiation for inducing abscopal effects

              Considerable interest is being directed toward combining immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with radiotherapy to improve response rates to ICI, which have been disappointingly low at around 15-30% among patients with advanced-stage cancers other than melanoma. Since a case report published in 2012, in which authors described the resolution of metastatic disease after irradiation of a single lesion in a patient who had been receiving ICI, hundreds of clinical trials have been launched with the aim of testing the safety and/or efficacy of radiotherapy in combination with immunotherapy, nearly all of which use this single-site irradiation, or 'abscopal', approach. However, emerging preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that this approach likely produces suboptimal results. In this Perspective, we describe this evidence and provide a biological rationale supporting the abandonment of the single-site abscopal approach. We instead advocate exploring comprehensive irradiation of multiple/all lesions in order to enhance the likelihood of obtaining meaningful clinical outcomes - if such a clinical synergy between radiation and ICI does exist - before the failure of the current, single-site approach leads to the potential premature and inappropriate abandonment of radiotherapy in combination with ICI altogether.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                04 September 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 835
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Hospital , Incheon, South Korea
                [2] 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul, South Korea
                [3] 3Department of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul, South Korea
                [4] 4Department of Dermatology, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul, South Korea
                [5] 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul, South Korea
                Author notes

                Edited by: Steven H. Lin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States

                Reviewed by: Andrew Sharabi, University of California, San Diego, United States; Sana D. Karam, Georgetown University, United States

                *Correspondence: Jee Suk Chang changjeesuk@ 123456yuhs.ac
                Sang Joon Shin ssj338@ 123456yuhs.ac

                This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2019.00835
                6738222
                31552171
                3ca7355a-dd86-480f-ada3-38d283cc603f
                Copyright © 2019 Kim, Chang, Roh, Oh, Chung, Shin and Koom.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 May 2019
                : 13 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 37, Pages: 9, Words: 6103
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                melanoma,immunotherapy,radiotherapy,local control,adverse events
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                melanoma, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, local control, adverse events

                Comments

                Comment on this article