12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Weed Functional Diversity as Affected by Agroecological Service Crops and No-Till in a Mediterranean Organic Vegetable System

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper explores the effect of agroecological service crops (ASCs), i.e., crops included in the crop rotation for their ecosystem services, terminated with an in-line tillage roller crimper (ILRC) on weed community composition and their functional traits in comparison to a tilled control without ASC. A two-year study was performed in a long-term experiment with vegetables under organic management. Four different cereal crops were introduced as ASCs. Weed abundance and richness and the functional traits were assessed at three different stages, i.e., before and after ASC termination and before harvest of the following crop, melon. All the ASCs showed strong weed suppression, with few differences between the cereals tested. Weed communities with ASCs had later flowering onset and wider flowering span compared to the control, which positively affects weed dispersal and attraction of beneficial insects. However, weed communities with ASCs had higher values for traits related to competition (specific leaf area, seed weight and more perennials). A trade-off between weed suppression and selection of more competitive weed communities by the introduction of ASCs managed with the ILRC should be evaluated in the long-run. The use of the ILRC alternating with other soil management practices seems the more effective strategy to benefit from the minimal soil tillage while avoiding the selection of disservice-related traits in the weed community.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice

              There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of nature-based management practices, such as social acceptability of farming.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plants (Basel)
                Plants (Basel)
                plants
                Plants
                MDPI
                2223-7747
                28 May 2020
                June 2020
                : 9
                : 6
                : 689
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Via della Navicella, 2, 00184 Roma, Italy; elena.testani@ 123456crea.gov.it (E.T.); alessandra.trinchera@ 123456crea.gov.it (A.T.)
                [2 ]Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, Postfach 219, 5070 Frick, Switzerland; laura.armengot@ 123456fibl.org
                [3 ]Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Via Salaria 1, 63030 Monsampolo del Tronto, Italy; fabrizio.leteo@ 123456crea.gov.it (F.L.); gabriele.campanelli@ 123456crea.gov.it (G.C.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: corrado.ciaccia@ 123456crea.gov.it ; Tel.: +39-06-700-54-13
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9349
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9820-9667
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-9466
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-9807
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-8964
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-5617
                Article
                plants-09-00689
                10.3390/plants9060689
                7356168
                32481720
                3cfc18c8-0983-4012-8963-9487417a4400
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 04 May 2020
                : 25 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                agroecology,weed biodiversity,mulch,community composition,ecological weed management

                Comments

                Comment on this article