43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Benefits of a Multimedia Educational Program for First-Time Hearing Aid Users

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          The aims of this study were to (1) develop a series of short interactive videos (or reusable learning objects [RLOs]) covering a broad range of practical and psychosocial issues relevant to the auditory rehabilitation for first-time hearing aid users; (2) establish the accessibility, take-up, acceptability and adherence of the RLOs; and (3) assess the benefits and cost-effectiveness of the RLOs.

          Design:

          The study was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial with two arms. The intervention group (RLO+, n = 103) received the RLOs plus standard clinical service including hearing aid(s) and counseling, and the waitlist control group (RLO−, n = 100) received standard clinical service only. The effectiveness of the RLOs was assessed 6-weeks posthearing aid fitting. Seven RLOs (total duration 1 hr) were developed using a participatory, community of practice approach involving hearing aid users and audiologists. RLOs included video clips, illustrations, animations, photos, sounds and testimonials, and all were subtitled. RLOs were delivered through DVD for TV (50.6%) and PC (15.2%), or via the internet (32.9%).

          Results:

          RLO take-up was 78%. Adherence overall was at least 67%, and 97% in those who attended the 6-week follow-up. Half the participants watched the RLOs two or more times, suggesting self-management of their hearing loss, hearing aids, and communication. The RLOs were rated as highly useful and the majority of participants agreed the RLOs were enjoyable, improved their confidence and were preferable to written information. Postfitting, there was no significant between-group difference in the primary outcome measure, overall hearing aid use. However, there was significantly greater hearing aid use in the RLO+ group for suboptimal users. Furthermore, the RLO+ group had significantly better knowledge of practical and psychosocial issues, and significantly better practical hearing aid skills than the RLO− group.

          Conclusions:

          The RLOs were shown to be beneficial to first-time hearing aid users across a range of quantitative and qualitative measures. This study provides evidence to suggest that the RLOs may provide valuable learning and educational support for first-time hearing aid users and could be used to supplement clinical rehabilitation practice.

          Abstract

          A series of seven multimedia interactive videos (or reusable learning objects [RLOs]) covering a range of practical and psychosocial information were developed for first-time hearing aid users. A prospective randomized controlled trial of 203 patients showed that the intervention group that received the RLOs had better knowledge of hearing-related issues, better practical hearing aid skills, and greater hearing aid use in suboptimal hearing aid users, compared with the control group at 6 weeks post-fitting. RLOs were rated as highly useful, and user feedback on the RLOs was very positive. Take-up was high and adherence was at least 67%. RLOs provide valuable educational support.

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

          The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure.

            The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a 22-item measure that assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management. The measure was developed using Rasch analyses and is an interval level, unidimensional, Guttman-like measure. The current analysis is aimed at reducing the number of items in the measure while maintaining adequate precision. We relied on an iterative use of Rasch analysis to identify items that could be eliminated without loss of significant precision and reliability. With each item deletion, the item scale locations were recalibrated and the person reliability evaluated to check if and how much of a decline in precision of measurement resulted from the deletion of the item. The data used in the analysis were the same data used in the development of the original 22-item measure. These data were collected in 2003 via a telephone survey of 1,515 randomly selected adults. Principal Findings. The analysis yielded a 13-item measure that has psychometric properties similar to the original 22-item version. The scores for the 13-item measure range in value from 38.6 to 53.0 (on a theoretical 0-100 point scale). The range of values is essentially unchanged from the original 22-item version. Subgroup analysis suggests that there is a slight loss of precision with some subgroups. The results of the analysis indicate that the shortened 13-item version is both reliable and valid.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Patients' memory for medical information.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ear Hear
                Ear Hear
                AUD
                Ear and Hearing
                Williams And Wilkins
                0196-0202
                1538-4667
                March 2016
                25 February 2016
                : 37
                : 2
                : 123-136
                Affiliations
                [1 ]NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; [2 ]Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom; [3 ]School of Medicine, and [4 ]School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Melanie Ferguson, NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham NG1 5DU, United Kingdom. E-mail: melanie.ferguson@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk
                Article
                00001
                10.1097/AUD.0000000000000237
                4764016
                26565785
                3d055b7e-5159-4fe8-a748-e76f82e35605
                Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 October 2014
                : 27 August 2015
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                auditory rehabilitation,education,e-learning,hearing aid benefit,hearing loss,knowledge,reusable learning objects,telehealth,teleaudiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article