6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of Presplitting Blasting Technology in Surrounding Rock Control of Gob-Side Entry Retaining with Hard Roof: A Case Study

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7
      Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
      Hindawi Limited

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Through the analysis of the mining situation and geological data of Qidong mine and working face, the key factors affecting the roof cutting and pressure relief roadway retention along the goaf are defined. Combined with numerical simulation and field test, the reasonable parameters of combined presplitting blasting of deep hole and shallow hole in hard roof are determined, and the roof cutting effect is tested through field observation and borehole peeping. The comprehensive control measures for the surrounding rock of 7135 roadway with roof cutting and pressure relief and gob retaining are formulated, including safety assurance technical measures, such as advanced precrack and seam cutting, roof reinforcement and support, gangue retaining protection beside the roadway, lagging temporary support, and on-site industrial test monitoring scheme. Aiming at the hard rock roof, the “deep hole + shallow hole” presplitting blasting roof cutting technology is developed, and the economic and reasonable blasting parameters are determined. The drilling peep results show that the implementation effect of presplitting blasting technology is good. The results showed that deep holes and shallow holes with small spacing and parallel to each other shall be arranged on the planned seam line. The peeping results show that the crack formation rate in the charging section exceeds 85% in the process of deep hole blasting. In shallow hole blasting, the crack formation rate of charging section is more than 90%.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Macro/meso failure behavior of surrounding rock in deep roadway and its control technology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rock burst prediction probability model based on case analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Drawing mechanisms for top coal in longwall top coal caving (LTCC): A review of two decades of literature

              This review details the state of the art in research on top coal drawing mechanisms in Longwall t op c oal c aving (LTCC) by examining the relevant literature over the last two decades. It starts with an introduction of the brief history and basic procedures of LTCC. The framework of research on the drawing mechanism, basic concepts, and some theoretical models of LTCC are detailed in sect. research framework of top coal drawing mechanism. The authors note that the T op c oal d rawbody (TCD), T op c oal b oundary (TCB) and T op c oal r ecovery r atio (TCRR) are key factors in the drawing mechanism. The B ody– b oundary– r atio (BBR) research system has been the classic framework for research over the last 20 years. The modified Bergmark–Roos model, which considers the effects of the supporting rear canopy, flowing velocity of top coal, and its shape factor, is optimal for characterizing the TCD. A 3D model to describe the TCB that considers the thicknesses of the coal seam and roof strata is reviewed. In sect. physical testing and numerical simulation, the physical tests and numerical simulations in the literature are classified for ease of bibliographical review, and classic conclusions regarding the drawing mechanism of top coal are presented and discussed with elaborate illustrations and descriptions. The deflection of the TCD is noted, and is caused by the shape of the rear canopy. The inclined coal seam always induces a larger TCD, and a deflection in the TCD has also been observed in it. The effects of the drawing sequence and drawing interval on the TCRR are reviewed, where a long drawing interval is found to lead to significant loss of top coal. Its flowing behavior and velocity distribution are also presented. Sect. practical applications of drawing mechanisms for LTCC mines 4 summarizes over 10 cases where the TCRR of LTCC mines improved due to the guidance of the drawing mechanism. The final section provides a summary of the work here and some open questions. Prospective investigations are highlighted to give researchers guidance on promising issues in future research on LTCC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
                Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
                Hindawi Limited
                1687-8442
                1687-8434
                October 15 2021
                October 15 2021
                : 2021
                : 1-17
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 100011, China
                [2 ]School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
                [3 ]Henan Key Laboratory for Green and Efficient Mining & Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral Resources, Jiaozuo 454000, China
                [4 ]North China Company, SINOPEC, Zhengzhou,450006, China
                [5 ]School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Henan Jiaozuo 454000, China
                [6 ]China Institute of Geo-Environmental Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China
                [7 ]Key Laboratory of Mine Ecological Effects and Systematic Restoration, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China
                Article
                10.1155/2021/1318975
                3d17fad3-f10a-466d-9363-3e99382fbea2
                © 2021

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article