12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Supervised workplace learning in postgraduate training: a realist synthesis

      review-article
      1 , 1 , 1 ,
      Medical Education
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          This paper presents a realist synthesis of the literature that began with the objective of developing a theory of workplace learning specific to postgraduate medical education ( PME). As the review progressed, we focused on informal learning between trainee and senior doctor or supervisor, asking what mechanisms occur between trainee and senior doctor that lead to the outcomes of PME, and what contexts shape the operation of these mechanisms and the outcomes they produce?

          Methods

          We followed the procedures outlined in the RAMESES Publication Standards for Realist Synthesis. We searched the English‐language literature published between 1995 and 2017 for empirical papers related to informal workplace learning between supervisor and trainee, excluding formal interventions such as workplace‐based assessment. We made a pragmatic decision to exclude general practice training to keep the review within manageable limits.

          Results

          We reviewed 5197 papers and selected 90. Synthesis revealed three workplace learning processes occurring between supervisors and trainees, each underpinned by a pair of mechanisms: supervised participation in practice (entrustment and support seeking); mutual observation of practice (monitoring and modelling), and dialogue during practice (meaning making and feedback). These mechanisms result in outcomes of PME, including safe participation in practice, learning skills, attitudes and behaviours and professional identity development. Contexts shaping the outcomes of these mechanisms were identified at individual, interpersonal, local and systems levels.

          Conclusions

          Our realist theory of workplace learning between supervisors and trainees is informed by theory and empirical research. It highlights the two‐way nature of supervision, the importance of trainees’ agency in their own learning and the deleterious effect of fragmented working patterns on supervisor–trainee learning mechanisms. Further empirical research is required to test and refine this theory. In the meantime, it provides a useful framework for the design of supportive learning environments and for the preparation of supervisors and trainees for their roles in workplace learning.

          Abstract

          The authors describe a realist theory of learning between supervisor and postgraduate trainee in the workplace, emphasising the role of individual, interpersonal, local and systems contexts in shaping key mechanisms and their outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references116

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83.

          There are many theories that explain how adults learn and each has its own merits. This Guide explains and explores the more commonly used ones and how they can be used to enhance student and faculty learning. The Guide presents a model that combines many of the theories into a flow diagram which can be followed by anyone planning learning. The schema can be used at curriculum planning level, or at the level of individual learning. At each stage of the model, the Guide identifies the responsibilities of both learner and educator. The role of the institution is to ensure that the time and resources are available to allow effective learning to happen. The Guide is designed for those new to education, in the hope that it can unravel the difficulties in understanding and applying the common learning theories, whilst also creating opportunities for debate as to the best way they should be used.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning.

            To develop a model linking the processes and outcomes of workplace learning. We synthesised a model from grounded theory analysis of group discussions before and after experimental strengthening of medical students' workplace learning. The research was conducted within a problem-based clinical curriculum with little early workplace experience, involving 24 junior and 12 senior medical students. To reach their ultimate goal of helping patients, medical students must develop 2 qualities. One is practical competence; the other is a state of mind that includes confidence, motivation and a sense of professional identity. These 2 qualities reinforce one another. The core process of clinical workplace learning involves 'participation in practice', which evolves along a spectrum from passive observation to performance. Practitioners help students participate by being both supportive and challenging. The presentation of clear learning objectives and continuous periods of attachment that are as personal to the student(s) and practitioner(s) as possible promote workplace learning. The core condition for clinical workplace learning is 'supported participation', the various outcomes of which are mutually reinforcing and also reinforce students' ability to participate in further practice. This synthesis has 2 important implications for contemporary medical education: any reduction in medical students' participation in clinical practice that results from the patient safety agenda and expanded numbers of medical students is likely to have an adverse effect on learning, and the construct of 'self-directed learning', which our respondents too often found synonymous with 'lack of support', should be applied with very great caution to medical students' learning in clinical workplaces.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emergency department crowding, part 1--concept, causes, and moral consequences.

              Crowding is an increasingly common occurrence in hospital-based emergency departments (EDs) across the globe. This 2-article series offers an ethical and policy analysis of ED crowding. Part 1 begins with a discussion of terms used to describe this situation and proposes that the term "crowding" be preferred to "overcrowding." The article discusses definitions, measures, and causes of ED crowding and concludes that the inability to transfer emergency patients to inpatient beds and resultant boarding of admitted patients in the ED are among the root causes of ED crowding. Finally, the article identifies and describes a variety of adverse moral consequences of ED crowding, including increased risks of harm to patients, delays in providing needed care, compromised privacy and confidentiality, impaired communication, and diminished access to care. Part 2 of the series examines barriers to resolving the problem of ED crowding and strategies proposed to overcome those barriers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d.bennett@ucc.ie
                Journal
                Med Educ
                Med Educ
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2923
                MEDU
                Medical Education
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0308-0110
                1365-2923
                21 August 2018
                September 2018
                : 52
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1111/medu.2018.52.issue-9 )
                : 951-969
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Medical Education Unit University College Cork Cork Ireland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Deirdre Bennett, Medical Education Unit , School of Medicine, University College Cork, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, College Road, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland. Tel: 00 353 21 490 1591; E‐mail:  d.bennett@ 123456ucc.ie
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4469-9138
                Article
                MEDU13655
                10.1111/medu.13655
                6175369
                3d651ade-3211-4670-a966-7c5dae21f3c3
                © 2018 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 January 2018
                : 16 March 2018
                : 12 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 19, Words: 12720
                Funding
                Funded by: Health Research Board
                Categories
                Medical education in Review
                Medical Education in Review
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                medu13655
                September 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.0 mode:remove_FC converted:08.10.2018

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article