Visual acuity is the most frequently performed measure of visual function in clinical practice and the majority of people worldwide living with visual impairment are living in low and middle-income countries
To design and validate a smartphone-based visual acuity test that is not dependent on familiarity with symbols or letters commonly used in the English language.
Validation study comparing results from smartphone Peek Acuity to Snellen Acuity (clinical normal) and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) LogMAR chart (reference standard).
This study was nested within the six-year follow-up of the Nakuru Eye Disease Cohort in central Kenya.
Three hundred adults aged 55 years and above, recruited consecutively from the Nakuru Eye Disease Cohort Study..
Outcome measures were monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) visual acuity scores for each test: ETDRS LogMAR, Snellen and Peek. Peek was compared, in terms of test-retest variability (TRV) and measurement time, with that of the Snellen and ETDRS LogMAR chart in participants’ homes and temporary clinic settings in rural Kenya in 2013/2014.
The 95% confidence limits for TRV of smartphone acuity data were +/-0.033 LogMAR. The mean difference between smartphone and ETDRS and smartphone and Snellen acuity data was 0.07 (95%CI: 0.05-0.09) and 0.08 (95%CI: 0.06-0.10) LogMAR respectively indicating that smartphone acuities agreed well with those of the ETDRS chart and Snellen. The agreement of Peek and ETDRS was greater than Snellen with ETDRS, p=0.08 (95%CI 0.05 to 0.10). The local Kenyan community health care workers readily accepted the Peek Acuity smartphone test; it required minimal training and took no longer than Snellen; 77s vs. 82s (95%CI: 71 – 84s vs. 73 – 91s, p=0.13).