11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Development and Validation of a Smartphone Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Visual acuity is the most frequently performed measure of visual function in clinical practice and the majority of people worldwide living with visual impairment are living in low and middle-income countries

          Objective

          To design and validate a smartphone-based visual acuity test that is not dependent on familiarity with symbols or letters commonly used in the English language.

          Design

          Validation study comparing results from smartphone Peek Acuity to Snellen Acuity (clinical normal) and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) LogMAR chart (reference standard).

          Setting

          This study was nested within the six-year follow-up of the Nakuru Eye Disease Cohort in central Kenya.

          Participants

          Three hundred adults aged 55 years and above, recruited consecutively from the Nakuru Eye Disease Cohort Study..

          Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)

          Outcome measures were monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) visual acuity scores for each test: ETDRS LogMAR, Snellen and Peek. Peek was compared, in terms of test-retest variability (TRV) and measurement time, with that of the Snellen and ETDRS LogMAR chart in participants’ homes and temporary clinic settings in rural Kenya in 2013/2014.

          Results

          The 95% confidence limits for TRV of smartphone acuity data were +/-0.033 LogMAR. The mean difference between smartphone and ETDRS and smartphone and Snellen acuity data was 0.07 (95%CI: 0.05-0.09) and 0.08 (95%CI: 0.06-0.10) LogMAR respectively indicating that smartphone acuities agreed well with those of the ETDRS chart and Snellen. The agreement of Peek and ETDRS was greater than Snellen with ETDRS, p=0.08 (95%CI 0.05 to 0.10). The local Kenyan community health care workers readily accepted the Peek Acuity smartphone test; it required minimal training and took no longer than Snellen; 77s vs. 82s (95%CI: 71 – 84s vs. 73 – 91s, p=0.13).

          Conclusions

          The study demonstrated that the Peek Acuity smartphone test is capable of accurate and repeatable acuity measurements consistent with published data on the TRV of acuities measured using five-letter-per-line retro-illuminated LogMAR charts.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101589539
          40866
          JAMA Ophthalmol
          JAMA Ophthalmol
          JAMA ophthalmology
          2168-6165
          2168-6173
          10 February 2017
          August 2015
          22 February 2017
          : 133
          : 8
          : 930-937
          Affiliations
          [1 ]International Centre for Eye Health, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT
          [2 ]Kitale and Zonal eye surgeon. North Rift Kenya
          [3 ]Glasgow Centre for Ophthalmic Research, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow G12 0YN
          [4 ]MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT
          [5 ]International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT
          [6 ]NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, 162 City Road, London, EV1V 2PD, UK
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author: Mr Andrew Bastawrous BSc (Hons) MBChB HFEA MRCOphth, Clinical Lecturer in International Eye Health, International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Andrew.Bastawrous@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk . Phone: 0207 958 8333
          Article
          PMC5321502 PMC5321502 5321502 ems71476
          10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468
          5321502
          26022921
          3d7a0c36-4897-437d-a6ed-f682363b7a94
          History
          Categories
          Article

          validation,test-retest variability,specificity,sensitivity,Visual acuity,smartphone,logMAR,Snellen

          Comments

          Comment on this article