5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      First in Human Experience with Peritoneal Direct Sodium Removal Using a Zero Sodium Solution: A New Candidate Therapy for Volume Overload

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Loop diuretics have well described toxicities and loss of response to these agents is common. Alternative strategies are needed for the maintenance of euvolemia in heart failure (HF). Non-renal removal of sodium directly across the peritoneal membrane (direct sodium removal, DSR) using a sodium free osmotic solution should result in extraction of large quantities of sodium with limited off target solute removal.

          Methods: This report describes the pre-clinical development and first-in-human proof of concept for DSR. Sodium free 10% dextrose was utilized as the DSR solution. Porcine experiments were conducted to investigate the optimal dwell time, safety, scalability, and to determine the effect of experimental HF. In the human study, participants with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) underwent randomization and crossover to either a two-hour dwell with one liter of DSR solution or standard PD solution (Dianeal 4.25% dextrose, Baxter). The primary endpoint was completion of the 2-hour dwell without significant discomfort or adverse events, and the secondary endpoint was difference in sodium removal between DSR and standard PD solution.

          Results: Porcine experiments revealed that one liter of DSR solution removed 4.1±0.4 grams of sodium in 2 hours with negligible off target solute removal and overall stable serum electrolytes. Increasing the volume of DSR solution cycled across the peritoneum increased sodium removal and substantially decreased plasma volume (p=0.005). In the setting of experimental HF with elevated right atrial pressure, sodium removal was ~4 times greater than in healthy animals (p<0.001). In the human proof of concept study, DSR solution was well-tolerated and not associated with significant discomfort or adverse events. Plasma electrolyte concentrations were stable and off target solute removal was negligible. Sodium removal was substantially higher with DSR (4.5±0.4 grams) compared to standard PD solution (1.0±0.3 grams, p<0.0001).

          Conclusions: DSR was well-tolerated in both animals and human subjects and produced substantially greater sodium removal than standard PD solution. Additional research evaluating the use of DSR as a method to prevent and treat hypervolemia in HF is warranted.

          Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT03801226

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hyponatremia: evaluating the correction factor for hyperglycemia.

          There are no controlled experimental data that assess the accuracy of the commonly used correction factor of a 1.6 meq/L decrease in serum sodium concentration for every 100 mg/dL increase in plasma glucose concentration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate experimentally the hyponatremic response to acute hyperglycemia. Somatostatin was infused to block endogenous insulin secretion in 6 healthy subjects. Plasma glucose concentrations were increased to >600 mg/dL within 1 hour by infusing 20% dextrose. The glucose infusion was then stopped and insulin given until the plasma glucose concentration decreased to 140 mg/dL. Plasma glucose and serum sodium concentrations were measured every 10 minutes. Overall, the mean decrease in serum sodium concentration averaged 2.4 meq/L for every 100 mg/dL increase in glucose concentration. This value is significantly greater than the commonly used correction factor of 1.6 (P = 0.02). Moreover, the association between sodium and glucose concentrations was nonlinear. This was most apparent for glucose concentrations >400 mg/dL. Up to 400 mg/dL, the standard correction of 1.6 worked well, but if the glucose concentration was >400 mg/dL, a correction factor of 4.0 was better. These data indicate that the physiologic decrease in sodium concentration is considerably greater than the standard correction factor of 1.6 (meq/L Na per 100 mg/dL glucose), especially when the glucose concentration is >400 mg/dL. Additionally, a correction factor of a 2.4 meq/L decrease in sodium concentration per 100 mg/dL increase in glucose concentration is a better overall estimate of this association than the usual correction factor of 1.6.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diuretic response in acute heart failure: clinical characteristics and prognostic significance.

            Diminished diuretic response is common in patients with acute heart failure, although a clinically useful definition is lacking. Our aim was to investigate a practical, workable metric for diuretic response, examine associated patient characteristics and relationships with outcome. We examined diuretic response (defined as Δ weight kg/40 mg furosemide) in 1745 hospitalized acute heart failure patients from the PROTECT trial. Day 4 response was used to allow maximum differentiation in responsiveness and tailoring of diuretic doses to clinical response, following sensitivity analyses. We investigated predictors of diuretic response and relationships with outcome. The median diuretic response was -0.38 (-0.80 to -0.13) kg/40 mg furosemide. Poor diuretic response was independently associated with low systolic blood pressure, high blood urea nitrogen, diabetes, and atherosclerotic disease (all P < 0.05). Worse diuretic response independently predicted 180-day mortality (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.11-1.81, P = 0.005), 60-day death or renal or cardiovascular rehospitalization (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.59, P < 0.001) and 60-day HF rehospitalization (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.24-2.01, P < 0.001) in multivariable models. The proposed metric-weight loss indexed to diuretic dose-better captures a dose-response relationship. Model diagnostics showed diuretic response provided essentially the same or slightly better prognostic information compared with its individual components (weight loss and diuretic dose) in this population, while providing a less biased, more easily interpreted signal. Worse diuretic response was associated with more advanced heart failure, renal impairment, diabetes, atherosclerotic disease and in-hospital worsening heart failure, and predicts mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in this post hoc, hypothesis-generating study. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Low-dose dopamine or low-dose nesiritide in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction: the ROSE acute heart failure randomized trial.

              Small studies suggest that low-dose dopamine or low-dose nesiritide may enhance decongestion and preserve renal function in patients with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction; however, neither strategy has been rigorously tested.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation
                Circulation
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                January 08 2020
                January 08 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT
                [2 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT
                [3 ]Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
                [4 ]Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, CT
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Immunology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT
                [6 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, CT
                [8 ]Program of Applied Translational Research, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043062
                7331276
                31910658
                3d800b1c-34c5-4bff-8060-abdf37512449
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article