48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of a 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Valid and reliable instruments for the measurement of enacted, anticipated and internalised stigma in people living with HIV are crucial for mapping trends in the prevalence of HIV-related stigma and tracking the effectiveness of stigma-reducing interventions. Although longer instruments exist, e.g., the commonly used 40-item HIV Stigma Scale by Berger et al., a shorter instrument would be preferable to facilitate the inclusion of HIV stigma in more and broader surveys. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop a substantially shorter, but still valid, version of the HIV Stigma Scale.

          Methods

          Data from a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish 40-item HIV Stigma Scale were reanalysed to create a short version with 12 items (three from each of the four stigma subscales: personalised stigma, disclosure concerns, concerns with public attitudes and negative self-image). The short version of the HIV stigma scale was then psychometrically tested using data from a national survey investigating stigma and quality of life among people living with HIV in Sweden ( n = 880, mean age 47.9 years, 26% female).

          Results

          The hypothesized factor structure of the proposed short version was replicated in exploratory factor analysis without cross loadings and confirmatory factor analysis supported construct validity with high standardised effects (>0.7) of items on the intended scales. The χ 2 test was statistically significant (χ 2 = 154.2, df = 48, p < 0.001), but alternate fit measures indicated acceptable fit (comparative fit index: 0.963, Tucker-Lewis index: 0.950 and root mean square error of approximation: 0.071). Corrected item-total correlation coefficients were >0.4 for all items, with a variation indicating that the broadness of the concept of stigma had been captured. All but two aspects of HIV-related stigma that the instrument is intended to cover were captured by the selected items in the short version. The aspects that did not lose any items were judged to have acceptable psychometric properties. The short version of the instrument showed higher floor and ceiling effects than the full-length scale, indicating a loss of sensitivity in the short version. Cronbach’s α for the subscales were all >0.7.

          Conclusions

          Although being less sensitive in measurement, the proposed 12-item short version of the HIV Stigma Scale has comparable psychometric properties to the full-length scale and may be used when a shorter instrument is needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          Using Multivariate Statistics

          A Practical Approach to using Multivariate Analyses Using Multivariate Statistics , 6th edition provides advanced undergraduate as well as graduate students with a timely and comprehensive introduction to today's most commonly encountered statistical and multivariate techniques, while assuming only a limited knowledge of higher-level mathematics. This text's practical approach focuses on the benefits and limitations of applications of a technique to a data set - when, why, and how to do it. Learning Goals Upon completing this book, readers should be able to: Learn to conduct numerous types of multivariate statistical analyses Find the best technique to use Understand Limitations to applications Learn how to use SPSS and SAS syntax and output
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

            Interest has increased in recent years in incorporating health status measures into clinical practice for use at the individual-patient level. We propose six measurement standards for individual-patient applications: (1) practical features, (2) breadth of health measured, (3) depth of health measured, (4) precision for cross-sectional assessment, (5) precision for longitudinal monitoring and (6) validity. We evaluate five health status surveys (Functional Status Questionnaire, Dartmouth COOP Poster Charts, Nottingham Health Profile, Duke Health Profile, and SF-36 Health Survey) that have been proposed for use in clinical practice. We conducted an analytical literature review to evaluate the six measurement standards for individual-patient applications across the five surveys. The most problematic feature of the five surveys was their lack of precision for individual-patient applications. Across all scales, reliability standards for individual assessment and monitoring were not satisfied, and the 95% CIs were very wide. There was little evidence of the validity of the five surveys for screening, diagnosing, or monitoring individual patients. The health status surveys examined in this paper may not be suitable for monitoring the health and treatment status of individual patients. Clinical usefulness of existing measures might be demonstrated as clinical experience is broadened. At this time, however, it seems that new instruments, or adaptation of existing measures and scaling methods, are needed for individual-patient assessment and monitoring.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              From conceptualizing to measuring HIV stigma: a review of HIV stigma mechanism measures.

              Recent analyses suggest that lack of clarity in the conceptualization and measurement of HIV stigma at an individual level is a significant barrier to HIV prevention and treatment efforts. In order to address this concern, we articulate a new framework designed to aid in clarifying the conceptualization and measurement of HIV stigma among individuals. The HIV Stigma Framework explores how the stigma of HIV elicits a series of stigma mechanisms, which in turn lead to deleterious outcomes for HIV uninfected and infected people. We then apply this framework to review measures developed to gauge the effect of HIV stigma since the beginning of the epidemic. Finally, we emphasize the utility of using three questions to guide future HIV stigma research: who is affected by, how are they affected by, and what are the outcomes of HIV stigma?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                maria.reinius@ki.se
                lena.wettergren@ki.se
                maria.wiklander@ki.se
                veronica.svedhem-johansson@karolinska.se
                anna.mia.ekstrom@ki.se
                +46 8 524 800 00 , lars.eriksson@ki.se
                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                30 May 2017
                30 May 2017
                2017
                : 15
                : 115
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, , Karolinska Institutet, ; SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, , Karolinska Institutet, ; SE-141 83 Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Huddinge, , Karolinska Institutet, ; SE-141 83 Stockholm, Sweden
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9241 5705, GRID grid.24381.3c, Department of Infectious Diseases, , Karolinska University Hospital, ; SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Public Health, , Karolinska Institutet, ; SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2161 2573, GRID grid.4464.2, School of Health Sciences, City, , University of London, ; EC1V 0HB, London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-5325
                Article
                691
                10.1186/s12955-017-0691-z
                5450123
                28558805
                3db6ee8e-8373-4611-80e3-e8a643d335a8
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 December 2016
                : 24 May 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Doctoral School in Health Care Sciences, Karolinska Institutet
                Award ID: 4314/11-532
                Funded by: The Public Health Agency of Sweden
                Award ID: 321/2013-2.3.2
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Short Report
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Health & Social care
                hiv,instrument,nursing,patient-reported outcome measures,psychometrics,short-form,stigma

                Comments

                Comment on this article