There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Common mental disorders often go undetected in primary care. Sharpening general practitioners'
(GPs') attention to potential signs thereof is therefore crucial. This conversation-analytic
study arises from the observation that the consideration of psychological problems
in new-concern visits can be achieved by way of 'gradual topic emergence'. This entails
that the problem is not presented directly, but adjunct to somatic symptoms, and is
hinted at by way of generic, ambiguous complaints, and furthermore by expressions
of frustration and uncertainty and talk about lifeworld problems. It is argued that
these materials are 'trouble-premonitory, alerting the GP to the presence of an underlying
problem that can then be addressed throughfurther inquiry. The patient logic behind
this approach is to assure the GP's recipiency and thus ratification of the problem's
medical legitimacy. It allows the patient to introduce a potentially delicate problem
'off the record, thus guarding the patient against the loss of face that could resultfrom
no uptake by the GP. The results of the study point to the importance of GPs being
receptive to such interactional clues to psychological problems provided by patients.