10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Plasma intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related peptide in familial benign hypercalcemia: greater responsiveness to endogenous PTH than in primary hyperparathyroidism.

      The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
      Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Calcium, blood, Family Health, Female, Humans, Hypercalcemia, genetics, Hyperparathyroidism, physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Parathyroid Hormone, Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein, Phosphates, Phosphorus, Proteins, analysis, secretion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The cause of hypercalcemia in familial benign hypercalcemia (FBH; also called familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia) is unclear, although it is PTH dependent. It is also uncertain how plasma PTH levels are related to the severity of biochemical abnormalities in FBH. Because the PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) has many PTH-like actions, it might have a role in the hypercalcemia of FBH. Thus, we studied 29 patients with FBH from 11 families, 29 age- and sex-matched controls, and 42 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (1 degree HPT), measuring PTH with a highly sensitive two-site immunochemiluminometric assay and the hypercalcemic tumor factor PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) with an extraction/concentration RIA. Plasma PTH values were elevated in 86% of 1 degree HPT patients (36 of 42), but in only 20% of FBH patients, (6 of 29). Plasma PTHrP was elevated in 1 FBH patient, and the group mean value was normal. Plasma PTH was positively correlated with calcium (Ca) in 1 degree HPT (r = 0.66; P less than 0.0001) and in FBH (r = 0.53; P less than 0.004), but the slopes of the regressions were markedly different: 1 degree HPT, 6.72; FBH, 1.61 (P less than 0.0001). There was a negative correlation between PTH and phosphorus (P) in 1 degree HPT (r = -0.39; P less than 0.01) and in FBH (r = -0.41; P less than 0.03), but, again, the slopes differed greatly: 1 degree HPT, -6.57; FBH, -1.95 (P less than 0.0001). There were no correlations between PTHrP and Ca or between PTH and PTHrP. The sums and products of PTH and PTHrP were not better correlated with Ca than PTH alone. Thus, PTH values are lower at given Ca and P levels in patients with FBH than in those with 1 degree HPT, suggesting that PTH is more effective in raising Ca and lowering P in FBH than in 1 degree HPT. The enigma of FBH remains: what molecular defect can simultaneously cause parathyroid cell insensitivity to Ca, enhanced renal tubular reabsorption of Ca, increased renal rejection of P, and enhanced or retained sensitivity to PTH?

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article