7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical benefit of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate in COPD: a multicentre, open-label, randomised study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mainly treated pharmaceutically with bronchodilators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of two-times-per-day aclidinium bromide (Acli-BID) compared with once-a-day tiotropium bromide hydrate (Tio-QD) in patients with COPD.

          Design

          This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised study.

          Setting

          Fourcentres in Kagawa prefecture, Japan.

          Participant

          Patients who were diagnosed to have COPD Grade 2–3 according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2015 criteria were enrolled.

          Interventions

          Patients were randomly assigned to receive Acli-BID or Tio-QD at a 1:1 ratio, and followed for 8 weeks. Acli-BID was administered in the morning and night, and Tio-QD was administered in the night.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          Primary outcome was forced expiratory volume in one second area under the curve (FEV 1AUC 0-3), and secondary outcomes were pulmonary function, physical activity, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) and COPD exacerbations. Adverse events were evaluated during the study.

          Results

          44 patients were included in this study. FEV 1AUC 0-3 at week 8 was 4.62±1.43 L·hour in Acli-BID and 4.73±1.60 L·hour in Tio-QD (mean difference (MD) −0.11 L·hour; 95% CI), −1.04 to 0.83). Significant improvement was observed in activity-related subscales of SGRQ (MD −7.78; 95% CI −14.61 to −0.94) and SF-8 (MD 4.01; 95% CI 0.37 to 7.65), mMRC (MD −0.66; 95% CI −1.19 to −0.13) and rate ratio (0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99) of exacerbations in the Acli-BID compared with the Tio-QD. Acli-BID and Tio-QD significantly improved sedentary behaviour (MD −35.20 min; 95% CI −67.41 to −2.94 and MD −55.40 min; 95% CI −98.15 to −12.77) within each group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups.

          Conclusion

          Acli-BID as with Tio-QD could be one of the therapeutic options for patients with COPD to improve pulmonary function. Also, our results suggest that intervention with bronchodilators enhanced physical activity in patients with COPD.

          Trial registration number

          UMIN 000020020.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Significance of Symptoms in Smokers with Preserved Pulmonary Function.

          Currently, the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires a ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 0.70 as assessed by spirometry after bronchodilator use. However, many smokers who do not meet this definition have respiratory symptoms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Physical activity and sedentary behaviour: applying lessons to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

            In health and disease, the benefits of regular participation in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity are well documented. However, individuals with chronic conditions, such as those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), typically do very little activity at a moderate or vigorous intensity. Much of their day is instead spent in sedentary behaviour, such as sitting or reclining, which requires very little energy expenditure. This high level of time spent in sedentary behaviour can have serious health consequences, including increased risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and premature mortality. There is emerging evidence to suggest that participation in light intensity physical activities (e.g. standing or slow walking) may have benefits for cardio-metabolic health. Given the low aerobic capacity of individuals with moderate to severe COPD, increasing light intensity activity (through reducing sedentary time) may be a feasible additional strategy to improve health in this population, alongside traditional recommendations to increase the time spent in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity. This review provides an overview of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, with a particular emphasis on these behaviours for people with COPD. It provides suggestions for the measurement of these behaviours within the clinical setting, as well as for interventions that may be effective at increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour in this population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COPD symptoms in the morning: impact, evaluation and management

              Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms in the morning, including dyspnea and sputum production, affect patients’ quality of life and limit their ability to carry out even simple morning activities. It is now emerging that these symptoms are associated with increased risk of exacerbations and work absenteeism, suggesting that they have a more profound impact on patients than previously thought. The development of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires to capture patients’ experience of COPD symptoms in the morning is, therefore, vital for establishing effective and comprehensive management strategies. Although it is well established that long-acting bronchodilators are effective in improving COPD symptoms, the limited available data on their impact on morning symptoms and activities have been obtained with non-validated PRO questionnaires. In this review, we discuss the impact of COPD symptoms in the morning and available tools used to evaluate them, and highlight specific gaps that need to be addressed to develop standardized instruments able to meet regulatory requirement. We also present available evidence on the effect of pharmacological therapies on morning symptoms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                26 July 2019
                : 9
                : 7
                : e024114
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Respiratory Medicine , Kamei Internal medicine and Respiratory Clinic , Takamatsu, Japan
                [2 ] departmentDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine , Sakaide City Hospital , Sakaide, Kagawa, Japan
                [3 ] departmentDepartment of Respiratory Medicine , Sanuki Municipal Hospital , Sanuki, Kagawa, Japan
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Respiratory Medicine , National Hospital Organization Wakayama Hospital , Wakayama, Japan
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease , Graduate school of Medicine, Yamaguchi University , Ube, Japan
                [6 ] departmentSleep and Respiratory Disease Center , KKR Takamatsu Hospital , Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Tadashi Kamei; t-kamei@ 123456mail.netwave.or.jp
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-3738
                Article
                bmjopen-2018-024114
                10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024114
                6661652
                31350236
                3e0e2e1a-08c7-4e37-9d82-4d803f386998
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 May 2018
                : 13 June 2019
                : 14 June 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.;
                Categories
                Respiratory Medicine
                Research
                1506
                1731
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine),clinical trials,thoracic medicine
                Medicine
                respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine), clinical trials, thoracic medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article