A comparison between two screening methods for detection of microproteinuria

Higby, Kenneth; Suiter, Cheryl R.; Siler-Khodr, Theresa Marie

doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)91335-1

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

A comparison between two screening methods for detection of microproteinuria

Author(s): Kenneth Higby , Cheryl R. Suiter , Theresa Siler-Khodr

Publication date Created: October 1995

Publication date (Print): October 1995

Journal: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abbreviated Title: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Publisher: Elsevier BV

ISSN (Print): 00029378

Publication date Created: October 1995

Publication date (Print): October 1995

Volume: 173

Issue: 4

Pages: 1111-1114

Article

DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91335-1

SO-VID: 3e1a00e8-4ee4-4228-97b2-23825f5331bd

License:

https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

History

Data availability:

A comparison between two screening methods for detection of microproteinuria

Read this article at

Related collections

NeuroImaging Methods

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 2,826

Cited by 1