2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Povidone Iodine Rectal Preparation at Time of Prostate Needle Biopsy is a Simple and Reproducible Means to Reduce Risk of Procedural Infection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Single institution and population-based studies highlight that infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB) are increasing. Such infections are largely attributable to quinolone resistant microorganisms which colonize the rectal vault and are translocated into the bloodstream during the biopsy procedure. A povidone iodine rectal preparation (PIRP) at time of biopsy is a simple, reproducible method to reduce rectal microorganism colony counts and therefore resultant infections following TRUS PNB.

          All patients are administered three days of oral antibiotic therapy prior to biopsy. The PIRP technique involves initially positioning the patient in the standard manner for a TRUS PNB. Following digital rectal examination, 15 ml of a 10% solution of commercially available povidone iodine is mixed with 5 ml of 1% lidocaine jelly to create slurry. A 4 cm x 4 cm sterile gauze is soaked in this slurry and then inserted into the rectal vault for 2 min after which it is removed. Thereafter, a disposable cotton gynecologic swab is used to paint both the perianal area and the rectal vault to a distance of 3 cm from the anus. The povidone iodine solution is then allowed to dry for 2 - 3 min prior to proceeding with standard transrectal ultrasonography and subsequent biopsy.

          This PIRP technique has been in practice at our institution since March of 2012 with an associated reduction of post-biopsy infections from 4.3% to 0.6% (p = 0.02). The principal advantage of this prophylaxis regimen is its simplicity and reproducibility with use of an easily available, inexpensive agent to reduce infections. Furthermore, the technique avoids exposing patients to additional systemic antibiotics with potential further propagation of multi-drug resistant organisms. Usage of PIRP at TRUS PNB, however, is not applicable for patients with iodine or shellfish allergies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Vis Exp
          J Vis Exp
          JoVE
          Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE
          MyJove Corporation
          1940-087X
          2015
          21 September 2015
          : 103
          : 52670
          Affiliations
          1Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
          2Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Penn State University
          Author notes

          Correspondence to: Jay D. Raman at jraman@ 123456hmc.psu.edu

          Article
          PMC4692615 PMC4692615 4692615 52670
          10.3791/52670
          4692615
          26436913
          3e4563e6-7742-4f2c-b440-5d82f671ed47
          Copyright © 2015, Journal of Visualized Experiments
          History
          Categories
          Medicine

          Medicine,Issue 103,Prostate needle biopsy,transrectal ultrasonography,infection,sepsis,urinary tract infection (UTI),prostate cancer

          Comments

          Comment on this article