6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Downstream mechanisms of nitric oxide-mediated skeletal muscle glucose uptake during contraction

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is evidence that nitric oxide (NO) is required for the normal increases in skeletal muscle glucose uptake during contraction, but the mechanisms involved have not been elucidated. We examined whether NO regulates glucose uptake during skeletal muscle contractions via cGMP-dependent or cGMP-independent pathways. Isolated extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles from mice were stimulated to contract ex vivo, and potential NO signaling pathways were blocked by the addition of inhibitors to the incubation medium. Contraction increased (P < 0.05) NO synthase (NOS) activity (∼40%) and dichlorofluorescein (DCF) fluorescence (a marker of oxidant levels; ∼95%), which was prevented with a NOS inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), and antioxidants [nonspecific antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine (NAC); thiol-reducing agent, DTT], respectively. L-NMMA and NAC both attenuated glucose uptake during contraction by ∼50% (P < 0.05), and their effects were not additive. Neither the guanylate cyclase inhibitor 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo-[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one, which prevents the formation of cGMP, the cGMP-dependent protein (PKG) inhibitor Rp-8-bromo-β-phenyl-1,N2-ethenoguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate sodium salt nor white light, which breaks S-nitrosylated bonds, affects glucose uptake during contraction; however, DTT attenuated (P < 0.05) contraction-stimulated glucose uptake (by 70%). NOS inhibition and antioxidant treatment reduced contraction-stimulated increases in protein S-glutathionylation and tyrosine nitration (P < 0.05), without affecting AMPK or p38 MAPK phosphorylation. In conclusion, we provide evidence to suggest that NOS-derived oxidants regulate skeletal muscle glucose uptake during ex vivo contractions via a cGMP/PKG-, AMPK-, and p38 MAPK-independent pathway. In addition, it appears that NO and ROS may regulate skeletal muscle glucose uptake during contraction through a similar pathway.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Protein S-glutathionylation: a regulatory device from bacteria to humans.

          S-Glutathionylation is the specific post-translational modification of protein cysteine residues by the addition of the tripeptide glutathione, the most abundant and important low-molecular-mass thiol within most cell types. Protein S-glutathionylation is promoted by oxidative or nitrosative stress but also occurs in unstressed cells. It can serve to regulate a variety of cellular processes by modulating protein function and to prevent irreversible oxidation of protein thiols. Recent findings support an essential role for S-glutathionylation in the control of cell-signalling pathways associated with viral infections and with tumour necrosis factor-(-induced apoptosis. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase has recently been implicated in the regulation of endothelin-1 synthesis by a novel, S-glutathionylation-based mechanism involving messenger RNA stability. Moreover, recent studies have identified S-glutathionylation as a redox signalling mechanism in plants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Physiology of Nitric Oxide in Skeletal Muscle

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Endothelial cell superoxide generation: regulation and relevance for cardiovascular pathophysiology.

              The endothelial generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is important both physiologically and in the pathogenesis of many cardiovascular disorders. ROS generated by endothelial cells include superoxide (O2-*), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), peroxynitrite (ONOO-*), nitric oxide (NO), and hydroxyl (*OH) radicals. The O2-* radical, the focus of the current review, may have several effects either directly or through the generation of other radicals, e.g., H2O2 and ONOO-*. These effects include 1) rapid inactivation of the potent signaling molecule and endothelium-derived relaxing factor NO, leading to endothelial dysfunction; 2) the mediation of signal transduction leading to altered gene transcription and protein and enzyme activities ("redox signaling"); and 3) oxidative damage. Multiple enzymes can generate O2-*, notably xanthine oxidase, uncoupled NO synthase, and mitochondria. Recent studies indicate that a major source of endothelial O2-* involved in redox signaling is a multicomponent phagocyte-type NADPH oxidase that is subject to specific regulation by stimuli such as oscillatory shear stress, hypoxia, angiotensin II, growth factors, cytokines, and hyperlipidemia. Depending on the level of oxidants generated and the relative balance between pro- and antioxidant pathways, ROS may be involved in cell growth, hypertrophy, apoptosis, endothelial activation, and adhesivity, for example, in diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, heart failure, and ischemia-reperfusion. This article reviews our current knowledge regarding the sources of endothelial ROS generation, their regulation, their involvement in redox signaling, and the relevance of enhanced ROS generation and redox signaling to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disorders where endothelial activation and dysfunction are implicated. Copyright 2004 American Physiological Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
                American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
                American Physiological Society
                0363-6119
                1522-1490
                December 2010
                December 2010
                : 299
                : 6
                : R1656-R1665
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;
                [2 ]Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living and the School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia
                Article
                10.1152/ajpregu.00433.2010
                20943856
                3e5d1460-1203-4596-976b-6963b57198b6
                © 2010
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article