13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality.

      Journal of Sex Research
      Adolescent, Adult, Deception, Female, Humans, Male, Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sexual Behavior, psychology, Social Behavior, Social Desirability, Truth Disclosure

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Men report more permissive sexual attitudes and behavior than do women. This experiment tested whether these differences might result from false accommodation to gender norms (distorted reporting consistent with gender stereotypes). Participants completed questionnaires under three conditions. Sex differences in self-reported sexual behavior were negligible in a bogus pipeline condition in which participants believed lying could be detected, moderate in an anonymous condition, and greatest in an exposure threat condition in which the experimenter could potentially view participants responses. This pattern was clearest for behaviors considered less acceptable for women than men (e.g., masturbation, exposure to hardcore & softcore erotica). Results suggest that some sex differences in self-reported sexual behavior reflect responses influenced by normative expectations for men and women.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          12806529
          10.1080/00224490309552164

          Chemistry
          Adolescent,Adult,Deception,Female,Humans,Male,Questionnaires,Sex Factors,Sexual Behavior,psychology,Social Behavior,Social Desirability,Truth Disclosure

          Comments

          Comment on this article