23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cyberbiosecurity: An Emerging New Discipline to Help Safeguard the Bioeconomy

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cyberbiosecurity is being proposed as a formal new enterprise which encompasses cybersecurity, cyber-physical security and biosecurity as applied to biological and biomedical-based systems. In recent years, an array of important meetings and public discussions, commentaries and publications have occurred that highlight numerous vulnerabilities. While necessary first steps, they do not provide a systematized structure for effectively promoting communication, education and training, elucidation and prioritization for analysis, research, development, test and evaluation and implementation of scientific, technological, standards of practice, policy, or even regulatory or legal considerations for protecting the bioeconomy. Further, experts in biosecurity and cybersecurity are generally not aware of each other's domains, expertise, perspectives, priorities, or where mutually supported opportunities exist for which positive outcomes could result. Creating, promoting and advancing a new discipline can assist with formal, beneficial and continuing engagements. Recent key activities and publications that inform the creation of Cyberbiosecurity are briefly reviewed, as is the expansion of Cyberbiosecurity to include biomanufacturing which is supported by a rigorous analysis of a biomanufacturing facility. Recommendations are provided to initialize Cyberbiosecurity and place it on a trajectory to establish a structured and sustainable discipline, forum and enterprise.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Strengths and limitations of the federal guidance on synthetic DNA.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defining the Synthetic Biology Supply Chain.

            Several recent articles have described risks posed by synthetic biology and spurred vigorous discussion in the scientific, commercial, and government communities about how to best detect, prevent, regulate, and respond to these risks. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL) deep experience working with dual-use technologies for the nuclear industry has shown that analysis of supply chains can reveal security vulnerabilities and ways to mitigate security risk without hindering beneficial research and commerce. In this article, a team of experts in synthetic biology, data analytics, and national security describe the overall supply chain surrounding synthetic biology to illustrate new insights about the effectiveness of current regulations, the possible need for different screening approaches, and new technical solutions that could help identify or mitigate risks in the synthetic biology supply chain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biosecurity in the age of Big Data: a conversation with the FBI

              New scientific frontiers and emerging technologies within the life sciences pose many global challenges to society. Big Data is a premier example, especially with respect to individual, national, and international security. Here a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation discusses the security implications of Big Data and the need for security in the life sciences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                05 April 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : 39
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Virginia Tech – National Capital Region, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Arlington, VA, United States
                [2] 2Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate, Federal Bureau of Investigation , Washington, DC, United States
                [3] 3Biological Process Development Facility, University of Nebraska , Lincoln, NE, United States
                [4] 4Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Kenneth I. Berns, University of Florida, United States

                Reviewed by: Koos Van Der Bruggen, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Netherlands; W. Seth Carus, National Defense University, United States

                *Correspondence: Randall S. Murch rmurch@ 123456vt.edu

                This article was submitted to Biosafety and Biosecurity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                10.3389/fbioe.2018.00039
                5895716
                29675411
                3ead56d9-867e-46ec-90b5-fd42094ff99e
                Copyright © 2018 Murch, So, Buchholz, Raman and Peccoud.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 January 2018
                : 21 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 6, Words: 4342
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Perspective

                cyberbiosecurity,bioeconomy,biosecurity,biomanufacturing,cybersecurity,cyber-physical security,supply chain

                Comments

                Comment on this article