17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “If It Feels Right, Do It”: Intuitive Decision Making in a Sample of High-Level Sport Coaches

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Comprehensive understanding and application of decision making is important for the professional practice and status of sports coaches. Accordingly, building on a strong work base exploring the use of professional judgment and decision making (PJDM) in sport, we report a preliminary investigation into uses of intuition by high-level coaches. Two contrasting groups of high-level coaches from adventure sports ( n = 10) and rugby union ( n = 8), were interviewed on their experiences of using intuitive and deliberative decision making styles, the source of these skills, and the interaction between the two. Participants reported similarly high levels of usage to other professions. Interaction between the two styles was apparent to varying degrees, while the role of experience was seen as an important precursor to greater intuitive practice and employment. Initially intuitive then deliberate decision making was a particular feature, offering participants an immediate check on the accuracy and validity of the decision. Integration of these data with the extant literature and implications for practice are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.

          A new version of the Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI), which measures rational and experiential thinking styles and includes subscales of self-reported ability and engagement, was examined in two studies. In Study 1, the two main scales were independent, and they and their subscales exhibited discriminant validity and contributed to the prediction of a variety of measures beyond the contribution of the Big Five scales. A rational thinking style was most strongly and directly related to Ego Strength, Openness, Conscientiousness, and favorable basic beliefs about the self and the world, and it was most strongly inversely related to Neuroticism and Conservatism. An experiential thinking style was most strongly directly related to Extraversion, Agreeableness, Favorable Relationships Beliefs, and Emotional Expressivity, and it was most strongly inversely related to Categorical Thinking, Distrust of Others, and Intolerance. In Study 2, a rational thinking style was inversely related and an experiential thinking style was unrelated to nonoptimal responses in a game of chance. It was concluded that the new REI is a significant improvement over the previous version and measures unique aspects of personality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Taking the Next Step: Ways Forward for Coaching Science

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Cognition in Skilled Action: Meshed Control and the Varieties of Skill Experience

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                14 April 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 504
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute for Coaching and Performance, University of Central Lancashire Preston, UK
                [2] 2Grey Matters Performance Ltd. Stratford upon Avon, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Erich J. Petushek, Michigan State University, USA

                Reviewed by: Peter J. Fadde, Southern Illinois University, USA; Carlos Eduardo Gonçalves, University of Coimbra, Portugal

                *Correspondence: Dave Collins DJCollins@ 123456uclan.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Cognitive Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00504
                4830814
                27148116
                3eae9d82-f657-4aae-9d0e-50913230b585
                Copyright © 2016 Collins, Collins and Carson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 November 2015
                : 24 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 10, Words: 8471
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                adventure sports,coaching practice,expertise,macro cognition,professional judgment and decision making,rugby

                Comments

                Comment on this article