4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Rapid diagnosis of infected ascitic fluid using leukocyte esterase dipstick testing.

      The American Journal of Gastroenterology
      Ascitic Fluid, cytology, Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases, Clinical Enzyme Tests, Humans, Neutrophils, Peritonitis, diagnosis, Time Factors, Urinalysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ascitic fluid infection is presumptively diagnosed when the fluid polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) concentration equals or exceeds 250 cells/microl. The leukocyte esterase (LE) test has been shown to be a good predictor of the presence of PMNs and bacteria in urine and other body fluids. This study examines the value of the Multistix 10 SG LE Dipstick test for the rapid diagnosis of infected ascitic fluid. One hundred thirty-six ascitic fluid samples were evaluated by PMN count, culture, and LE Dipstick testing. LE dipstick values of "small" or greater were considered positive. For each sample, the LE test result was compared to the corresponding PMN count and culture result. Ten of the 11 LE-positive samples had PMN >/=250 cells/microl, while 10 of 12 samples with PMN >/=250 cells/microl were also LE-positive. Of the 125 LE-negative samples, 123 were also negative by PMN count. One hundred twenty-three of the 124 samples with PMN <250 cells/microl had negative LE tests. There was a less concordant relationship between the LE test and culture results. The sensitivity and specificity of the LE test for detecting ascitic fluid PMN >/=250 cells/microl were 83% and 99%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The Multistix leukocyte esterase test is useful for the prompt detection of an elevated ascitic fluid PMN count, and represents a convenient new method for the rapid diagnosis of infected ascitic fluid.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Optimization of ascitic fluid culture technique.

          The conventional method of ascitic fluid culture detects bacteria in only 42%-65% of patients who have neutrocytic ascites and suspected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In this study ascitic fluid was cultured by the conventional method as well as by a new method consisting of bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascites. The conventional cultures grew bacteria in only 13 (43%) of 30 episodes of neutrocytic ascites, whereas the blood culture bottles grew bacteria in 28 (93%); this difference was significant (p less than 0.0001). The blood culture bottle method also resulted in more rapid detection of bacterial growth. The median concentration of bacteria in infected ascites was one organism per milliliter. Bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascitic fluid is more sensitive than the conventional method in detecting bacterial peritonitis. The insensitivity of the conventional method is probably due to the low concentration of bacteria in infected ascites and the small volume of ascites cultured by this method.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites: a variant of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

            Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is diagnosed when (a) the ascitic fluid culture is positive, (b) the ascitic fluid neutrophil count is greater than or equal to 250 cells/mm3 and (c) there is no evident intraabdominal surgically treatable source for infection. Few details are available regarding the variant of ascitic fluid infection in which the culture grows bacteria (pure growth of a single type of organism), but the neutrophil count is less than 250 cells/mm3. In this prospective study of 138 episodes of culture-positive spontaneously infected ascites detected in 105 patients, 44 (31.9%) were episodes of "monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites" compared with 94 (68.1%) episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Seventeen patients had both types of infection. The infection-related mortality and hospitalization mortality were similar between the two groups. Patients with bacterascites appeared to have less severe liver disease. In 62% of bacterascites episodes in which a second paracentesis was performed before any treatment the fluid spontaneously became sterile without development of ascitic fluid neutrocytosis. Thirty-eight percent of patients with bacterascites (who underwent a second paracentesis before treatment was started) progressed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis--sometimes within a few hours. The concentration of the chemoattractant C5a was not decreased in the ascitic fluid of the bacterascites patients; this excludes ascitic fluid C5a deficiency as the explanation of the lack of neutrocytosis. Monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites is a common variant of ascitic fluid infection that may resolve without treatment or may progress to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis by use of reagent strips.

              We studied the use of reagent strips for diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhotic patients with ascites. A reagent strip for leukocyte esterase designed for the testing of urine with a colorimetric 5-grade scale (0 to 4) was used to evaluate ascitic fluid in 228 nonselected paracentesis performed in 128 cirrhotic patients. We diagnosed 52 SBP and 5 secondary bacterial peritonitis by means of polymorphonuclear cell count and classical criteria. When we considered positive a reagent strip result of 3 or 4, sensitivity was 89% (51 of 57), specificity was 99% (170 of 171), and positive predictive value was 98%. When we considered positive a reagent strip result of 2 or more, sensitivity was 96% (55 of 57), specificity was 89% (152 of 171), and negative predictive value was 99%. In conclusion, the use of reagent strips is a rapid, easy to use, and inexpensive tool for diagnosis of ascitic fluid infection. A positive result should be an indication for empirical antibiotic therapy, and a negative result may be useful as a screening test to exclude SBP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                15056098
                10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04084.x

                Chemistry
                Ascitic Fluid,cytology,Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases,Clinical Enzyme Tests,Humans,Neutrophils,Peritonitis,diagnosis,Time Factors,Urinalysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article