17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19 will severely impact older people's lives, and in many more ways than you think!

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, also known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) will severely impact older people's lives. COVID-19 can lead to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and other health problems that can lead to poor prognoses, including death, especially in older people.1, 2 Environmental contamination has been identified as a route of transmission of COVID-19, 3 and for this reason, governments worldwide have been initiating quarantine measures that include keeping older people in “social isolation” to slow the transmission of the infection. These measures have a special focus of protecting older people. Is social isolation the best measure to protect older people's lives? There is emerging evidence that suggests that social isolation might be an important measure to protect against COVID-19 infections. 4 However, this may be a “two edge sword”. As we have known well before the pandemic, there are negative consequences of social isolation for older people. Physical activity Both incidental and planned physical activity are likely to decrease in all people with social distancing, but the consequences will be greater for older people due to their compromised cardiorespiratory fitness, and reduced muscle strength and muscle mass. 5 Mental health A recent study by Esain et al. 6 showed that 3 months of detraining (i.e. no physical exercise) led to a decline in not just physical functioning, but also in mental health and quality of life (QoL) in physically active older people. Such adverse consequences may be even greater in older individuals who are sedentary or in poor health. Lack of social connection and neighborhood engagement may also contribute to increased risk of mental disorders due to loneliness, especially in those who live alone. 7 Social isolation has such negative impact, that it remains a strong risk factor for increased mortality in older people after adjusting for demographic and health factors. 8 Being at home is not good medicine Staying at home can lead to additional health problems. For example, a lack of exposure to sunshine can lead to Vitamin D deficiency in older people. 9 Consequently, the immune system can be compromised and infections can occur at a higher frequency, in addition to an increased risk of falling. 9 Confined home environments can also lead individuals with balance and mobility impairments, such as those with Parkinson's disease and dementia, to experience falls. 10 Finally, poor access to physical exercises, when combined with illnesses, fear of falling, and poor motivation can lead to an entrenched sedentary lifestyle, 11 and in consequence declines in both physical and mental health. 5 Therefore, while still unknown, the effects of social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on older people may be substantial. Falls – this is why we are so concerned! Lack of Vitamin D, depression, illness and associated polypharmacy, cognitive decline, loneliness, decline in physical activity levels, increased body mass,5, 7, 9, 12, 13 all negative consequences of social isolation, can increase the risk of falls in older people. A fall at home can lead to serious injuries such as fractures and head trauma, as well as undermine balance confidence and induce excessive fear of falling. For older people who live alone, there is also the risk of a fall-related long lie, i.e. remaining on the floor for 24 h or more following the fall. As could be expected, such a fall-related consequence is a risk factor for significant morbidity and death. Further work to be done Extensive public health research will be required to determine the extent to which social isolation during the current extensive quarantine periods will adversely affect older people as well as what factors mitigate against such adverse effects. Important questions include: (i) how can we provide physical activity during social isolation? (ii) how can we enhance individuals’ quality of life after social isolation is over? and (iii) how can we prepare ourselves in case a new wave of COVID-19 or another pandemic occurs? However, a number of evidence-based initiatives can be implemented without delay. Physicians and allied-health professionals can use telemedicine to provide consultations, assessments, and interventions. 14 As long as the clients have (i) a mobile device or a tablet; (ii) high-speed internet; (iii) and a home area clear of obstacles to exercise; (iv) an assistant or an auxiliary device to help with balance; appropriate exercise interventions and physical assessments can be delivered. There is good evidence that home-based exercise programs can be conducted safely and can enhance quality of life and reduce the risk of falls in older people. 15 Finally, occupational therapy interventions involving removal of environmental hazards along with counseling regarding safe mobility in the home may also help prevent falls in at-risk individuals. Funding Paulo Pelicioni was a recipient of a Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Nivel Superior (CAPES) PhD scholarship [Grant number: BEX 2194/15-5]. Stephen Lord is supported by a NHMRC Research Fellowship. Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Air, Surface Environmental, and Personal Protective Equipment Contamination by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) From a Symptomatic Patient

          This study documents results of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of environmental surfaces and personal protective equipment surrounding 3 COVID-19 patients in isolation rooms in a Singapore hospital.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19

            On Dec 31, 2019, the WHO China Country Office received notice of a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown aetiology in the Chinese city of Wuhan, Hubei province. 1 The incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]) has since risen exponentially, now affecting all WHO regions. The number of cases reported to date is likely to represent an underestimation of the true burden as a result of shortcomings in surveillance and diagnostic capacity affecting case ascertainment in both high-resource and low-resource settings. 2 By all scientifically meaningful criteria, the world is undergoing a COVID-19 pandemic. In the absence of any pharmaceutical intervention, the only strategy against COVID-19 is to reduce mixing of susceptible and infectious people through early ascertainment of cases or reduction of contact. In The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Joel Koo and colleagues 3 assessed the potential effect of such social distancing interventions on SARS-CoV-2 spread and COVID-19 burden in Singapore. The context is worthy of study, since Singapore was among the first settings to report imported cases, and has so far succeeded in preventing community spread. During the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) outbreak in Singapore, numerous non-pharmaceutical interventions were implemented successfully, including effective triage and infection control measures in health-care settings, isolation and quarantine of patients with SARS and their contacts, and mass screening of school-aged children for febrile illness. 4 Each of these measures represented an escalation of typical public health action. However, the scale and disruptive impact of these interventions were small compared with the measures that have been implemented in China in response to COVID-19, including closure of schools, workplaces, roads, and transit systems; cancellation of public gatherings; mandatory quarantine of uninfected people without known exposure to SARS-CoV-2; and large-scale electronic surveillance.5, 6 Although these actions have been praised by WHO, 5 the possibility of imposing similar measures in other countries raises important questions. Populations for whom social-distancing interventions have been implemented require and deserve assurance that the decision to enact these measures is informed by the best attainable evidence. For a novel pathogen such as SARS-CoV-2, mathematical modelling of transmission under differing scenarios is the only viable and timely method to generate such evidence. Koo and colleagues 3 adapted an existing influenza epidemic simulation model 7 using granular data on the composition and behaviour of the population of Singapore to assess the potential consequences of specific social-distancing interventions on the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2. The authors considered three infectivity scenarios (basic reproduction number [R 0] of 1·5, 2·0, or 2·5) and assumed between 7·5% and 50·0% of infections were asymptomatic. The interventions were quarantine with or without school closure and workplace distancing (whereby 50% of workers telecommute). Although the complexity of the model makes it difficult to understand the impact of each parameter, the primary conclusions were robust to sensitivity analyses. The combined intervention, in which quarantine, school closure, and workplace distancing were implemented, was the most effective: compared with the baseline scenario of no interventions, the combined intervention reduced the estimated median number of infections by 99·3% (IQR 92·6–99·9) when R 0 was 1·5, by 93·0% (81·5–99·7) when R 0 was 2·0, and by 78·2% (59·0–94·4) when R 0 was 2·5. The observation that the greatest reduction in COVID-19 cases was achieved under the combined intervention is not surprising. However, the assessment of the additional benefit of each intervention, when implemented in combination, offers valuable insight. Since each approach individually will result in considerable societal disruption, it is important to understand the extent of intervention needed to reduce transmission and disease burden. New findings emerge daily about transmission routes and the clinical profile of SARS-CoV-2, including the substantially underestimated rate of infection among children. 8 The implications of such findings with regard to the authors' conclusions about school closure remain unclear. Additionally, reproductive number estimates for Singapore are not yet available. The authors estimated that 7·5% of infections are clinically asymptomatic, although data on the proportion of infections that are asymptomatic are scarce; as shown by Koo and colleagues in sensitivity analyses with higher asymptomatic proportions, this value will influence the effectiveness of social-distancing interventions. Additionally, the analysis assumes high compliance of the general population, which is not guaranteed. Although the scientific basis for these interventions might be robust, ethical considerations are multifaceted. 9 Importantly, political leaders must enact quarantine and social-distancing policies that do not bias against any population group. The legacies of social and economic injustices perpetrated in the name of public health have lasting repercussions. 10 Interventions might pose risks of reduced income and even job loss, disproportionately affecting the most disadvantaged populations: policies to lessen such risks are urgently needed. Special attention should be given to protections for vulnerable populations, such as homeless, incarcerated, older, or disabled individuals, and undocumented migrants. Similarly, exceptions might be necessary for certain groups, including people who are reliant on ongoing medical treatment. The effectiveness and societal impact of quarantine and social distancing will depend on the credibility of public health authorities, political leaders, and institutions. It is important that policy makers maintain the public's trust through use of evidence-based interventions and fully transparent, fact-based communication. © 2020 Caia Image/Science Photo Library 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Novel Coronavirus (COVID‐19) Epidemic: What Are the Risks for Older Patients?

              The World Health Organization confirmed 93,090 cases of novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 infections (COVID‐19) worldwide on March 04, 2020. 3,198 deaths were declared (3%). In the United States, 108 cases were confirmed.1 Coronavirus family members are known to be responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS‐CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS‐CoV), associated with severe complications, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan failure, and death, especially in individuals with underlying comorbidities and old age.2, 3 In a recently published large case series of 138 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 infected pneumonia, the 36 patients (26.1%) transferred to an intensive care unit were older and had more comorbidities (median age = 66 years; comorbidities in 72.2% of cases) than patients who did not receive intensive care unit care (median age = 51 years; comorbidities in 37.3% of cases).4 Comorbidities associated with severe clinical features were hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease, which we know are highly prevalent in older adults. Previously, the China National Health Commission reported that death mainly affects older adults, since the median age of the first 17 deaths up to January 22, 2020, was 75 years (range = 48‐89 years).5 Moreover, people aged 70 years or older had shorter median days (11.5 days) from the first symptom to death than younger adults (20 days), suggesting a faster disease progression in older adults.5 Since COVID‐19 seems to have a similar pathogenic potential as SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV,6 older adults are likely to be at increased risk of severe infections, cascade of complications, disability, and death, as observed with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infections.7, 8 The consequences of possible epidemics in long‐term care facilities could be severe on a population of older adults who are by definition frail and immunologically naïve towards this virus, even if the risk is of course for the moment mainly theoretical. Therefore, it seems essential to limit the risk of spreading the virus in facilities caring for older patients at all costs. This could mean drastic quarantine measures for staff members who have stayed in high‐risk areas or have been in close contact with possible cases. If any suspected case of COVID‐19 infection occurs, transfer to a specialized facility as soon as possible is crucial since long‐term care facilities are not adequately equipped to effectively manage case containment. While waiting for the transfer, placing the patient in a single room, wearing a mask (N95 or FFP2 respirators for healthcare practitioners), and careful hand hygiene using alcohol‐based hand rub (or soap and water when hands are visibly soiled) are the key prevention measures to limit spread of COVID‐19. They must also be combined with eye protection and systematic use of disposable blouses and gloves to provide the optimal level of protection. Clinical management of COVID‐19 should be guided by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.9, 10 There is no specific recommendation for older adults. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention state that there is no specific antiviral treatment recommended, and patients should receive supportive care to help relieve symptoms. For severe cases, treatment should include care to support vital organ functions.10 Secondary prevention and care of general complications could also be a major issue in older patients. Indeed, in seasonal influenza, for example, a large proportion of deaths are related to decompensation of comorbidities and complications occurring after the infection.7 Particularly, reducing incidence of venous thromboembolism, catheter‐related bloodstream infection, pressure ulcers, falls, and delirium is recommended. These measures should be adapted to comorbidities, polypharmacy, and frailty of older patients.9, 10 We assume that they could also be crucial in case of COVID‐19 in older adults.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Braz J Phys Ther
                Braz J Phys Ther
                Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
                Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
                1413-3555
                1809-9246
                1 May 2020
                1 May 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]Neuroscience Research Australia, New South Wales, Australia
                [b ]School of Public Health and Community and Medicine, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Neuroscience Research Australia, Barker Street, Randwick, N.S.W. 2031, Australia. p.pelicioni@ 123456neura.edu.au
                Article
                S1413-3555(20)30353-1
                10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.005
                7252007
                32387005
                3ed5a9eb-42c2-4c72-8d58-fcb99840ab31
                © 2020 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article