26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stages of Change, Smoking Behaviour and Readiness to Quit in a Large Sample of Indigenous Australians Living in Eight Remote North Queensland Communities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tobacco smoking is a major health issue for Indigenous Australians, however there are few interventions with demonstrated efficacy in this population. The Transtheoretical Model may provide a useful framework for describing smoking behaviour and assessing readiness to quit, with the aim of developing better interventions. Interviews were conducted with 593 Indigenous Australians in eight rural and remote communities in north Queensland, to examine stages of change and smoking behaviour. Among current smokers, 39.6% and 43.4% were in Precontemplation and Contemplation stages respectively. A further 13.9% were making preparations to quit (Preparation) whilst only 3.2% said they were actively trying to quit (Action). When analysed by stage of change, the pattern of smoking-related behaviours conformed to the results of past research using the model. Importantly however, distribution of individuals across the stages opposes those observed in investigations of smoking behaviour in non-Indigenous Australian populations. The Transtheoretical Model can be used to meaningfully classify Indigenous smokers in remote north Queensland according to stages along the behaviour change continuum. Importantly, in this large sample across eight communities, most Indigenous smokers were not making preparations to change their smoking behaviour. This suggests that interventions should focus on promoting movement toward the Preparation and Action stages of change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples: the Indigenous health gap.

          Disparities in health status between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and the total Australian population have been documented in a fragmentary manner using disparate health outcome measures. We applied the burden of disease approach to national population health datasets and Indigenous-specific epidemiological studies. The main outcome measure is the Indigenous health gap, i.e. the difference between current rates of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) by age, sex and cause for Indigenous Australians and DALY rates if the same level of mortality and disability as in the total Australian population had applied. The Indigenous health gap accounted for 59% of the total burden of disease for Indigenous Australians in 2003 indicating a very large potential for health gain. Non-communicable diseases explained 70% of the health gap. Tobacco (17%), high body mass (16%), physical inactivity (12%), high blood cholesterol (7%) and alcohol (4%) were the main risk factors contributing to the health gap. While the 26% of Indigenous Australians residing in remote areas experienced a disproportionate amount of the health gap (40%) compared with non-remote areas, the majority of the health gap affects residents of non-remote areas. Comprehensive information on the burden of disease for Indigenous Australians is essential for informed health priority setting. This assessment has identified large health gaps which translate into opportunities for large health gains. It provides the empirical base to determine a more equitable and efficient funding of Indigenous health in Australia. The methods are replicable and would benefit priority setting in other countries with great disparities in health experienced by Indigenous peoples or other disadvantaged population groups.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stage-based lifestyle interventions in primary care: are they effective?

            To systematically review the literature concerning the effect of stages-of-change-based interventions in primary care on smoking, physical activity, and dietary behavior. An extensive search (until July 2002) was performed using the following inclusion criteria: (1) (randomized) controlled trial (RCT/CT), (2) intervention initiated in primary care, (3) and intervention aimed at changing smoking, physical activity, or dietary behavior, and stages-of-change-based outcomes, and (4) behavioral outcomes. Methodologic quality was assessed, and conclusions on the effectiveness at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up were based on a rating system of five levels of evidence. Odds ratios were calculated when methodologically appropriate. A total of 29 trials were selected for inclusion. Thirteen studies included a physical activity intervention, 14 aimed at smoking cessation, and five included a dietary intervention. Overall methodologic quality was good. No evidence was found for an effect on stages of change and actual levels of physical activity. Based on the strength of the evidence, limited to no evidence was found for an effect on stages of change for smoking and smoking quit rates. Odds ratios for quitting smoking showed a positive trend. Strong evidence was found for an effect on fat intake at short- and long-term follow-up. Limited evidence was found for an effect on stages of change for fat intake at short-term follow-up. The scientific evidence for the effect of stages-of-change-based lifestyle interventions in primary care is limited. Limiting aspects in the stages-of-change concept with respect to complex behaviors as physical activity and dietary behavior are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the reliability of a stage of change scale.

              The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of a scale measuring Prochaska's stages of change. Although structured questionnaire items are being increasingly used to segment target audiences according to Prochaska and DiClemente's stages of change, we could find only one report in the literature assessing the reliability of such scales. The unreliability of single-item or algorithm questionnaire scales might be why a number of studies show only minimal differences on some variables between individuals in different stages of change. A survey of the Perth metropolitan general population aged 16-69 years (N = 2629) was completed in August-September 1992 as part of a 3 year evaluation of the Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation. The consistency of respondents' responses was assessed across two questions measuring stages of change for the behaviours quitting smoking (n = 404), reducing alcohol consumption (n = 57) and doing more exercise (n = 704). Given the immediacy of the test-retest situation, the reliability results are moderately encouraging: kappa = 0.72, 0.73 and 0.52 for quitting smoking, reducing alcohol and doing more exercise, respectively. Health researchers should be aware of the probable moderate level of reliability if using the type of scale assessed in this study, when interpreting differences between individuals in different stages. In practice, several questionnaire items for classification purposes should be used so that internal reliability measures can be calculated. It is recommended that research be undertaken to devise more reliable scales for stages of change for the various health behaviours. It is noted that the attitude literature with respect to context and time specific intentions could be helpful in devising such scales.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                16 April 2013
                April 2013
                : 10
                : 4
                : 1562-1571
                Affiliations
                [1 ]of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, South Australia; E-Mail: Robyn.McDermott@ 123456unisa.edu.au
                [2 ]of Public Health, Tropical Medicine & Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia; E-Mail: India.Bohanna@ 123456jcu.edu.au
                [3 ]of Psychology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia; E-Mail: anne.swinbourne@ 123456jcu.edu.au
                [4 ]of Indigenous Australian Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia; E-Mail: yvonne.cadetjames@ 123456jcu.edu.au
                [5 ]Health Service, Atherton, Queensland 4883, Australia; E-Mail: DMcKeown@ 123456wuchopperen.com
                Author notes
                [† ]

                authors contributed equally to this work.

                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: SandraKaye.Campbell@ 123456unisa.edu.au ; Tel.: + 61-8-830-21056; Fax: + 61-8-830-22794.
                Article
                ijerph-10-01562
                10.3390/ijerph10041562
                3709334
                23591787
                3ef61308-38ab-4643-9d16-87dfc71a0e8d
                © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 06 February 2013
                : 03 April 2013
                : 03 April 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                indigenous australians,smoking,stages of change
                Public health
                indigenous australians, smoking, stages of change

                Comments

                Comment on this article