4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Understanding the Global Challenges to Accessing Appropriate Wheelchairs: Position Paper

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Appropriate wheelchairs are often essential for the health and wellbeing of people with mobility impairments to enhance fundamental freedoms and equal opportunity. To date, provision has mainly focused on just delivering the wheelchair instead of following an evidence-based wheelchair service delivery process. In addition, many governments have not committed to a national wheelchair provision policy. Approach: To prepare this position paper, a systemic development model, founded on the sustainable human security paradigm, was employed to explore the global challenges to accessing appropriate wheelchairs. Positions: I: Consideration of key perspectives of wheelchair provision across the life course is essential to meet the needs to children, adults, older people and their families; II: Comprehensive wheelchair service delivery processes and a competent workforce are essential to ensure appropriate wheelchair service provision; III: Evaluations on wheelchair product quality development, performance and procurement standards are key as wheelchair product quality is generally poor; IV: Understanding the economic landscape when providing wheelchairs is critical. Wheelchair funding systems vary across jurisdictions; V: Establishing wheelchair provision policy is a key priority, as specific policy is limited globally. Conclusion: The vision is to take positive action to develop appropriate and sustainable wheelchair service provision systems globally, for me, for you, for us.

          Related collections

          Most cited references97

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence.

          The aim of this study was to describe systematically the best available intervention evidence for children with cerebral palsy (CP). This study was a systematic review of systematic reviews. The following databases were searched: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, DARE, EMBASE, Google Scholar MEDLINE, OTSeeker, PEDro, PsycBITE, PsycINFO, and speechBITE. Two independent reviewers determined whether studies met the inclusion criteria. These were that (1) the study was a systematic review or the next best available; (2) it was a medical/allied health intervention; and (3) that more than 25% of participants were children with CP. Interventions were coded using the Oxford Levels of Evidence; GRADE; Evidence Alert Traffic Light; and the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health. Overall, 166 articles met the inclusion criteria (74% systematic reviews) across 64 discrete interventions seeking 131 outcomes. Of the outcomes assessed, 16% (21 out of 131) were graded 'do it' (green go); 58% (76 out of 131) 'probably do it' (yellow measure); 20% (26 out of 131) 'probably do not do it' (yellow measure); and 6% (8 out of 131) 'do not do it' (red stop). Green interventions included anticonvulsants, bimanual training, botulinum toxin, bisphosphonates, casting, constraint-induced movement therapy, context-focused therapy, diazepam, fitness training, goal-directed training, hip surveillance, home programmes, occupational therapy after botulinum toxin, pressure care, and selective dorsal rhizotomy. Most (70%) evidence for intervention was lower level (yellow) while 6% was ineffective (red). Evidence supports 15 green light interventions. All yellow light interventions should be accompanied by a sensitive outcome measure to monitor progress and red light interventions should be discontinued since alternatives exist. © 2013 Mac Keith Press.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Assistive products and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

            The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have placed great emphasis on the need for much greater social inclusion, and on making deliberate efforts to reach marginalized groups. People with disabilities are often marginalized through their lack of access to a range of services and opportunities. Assistive products can help people overcome impairments and barriers enabling them to be active, participating and productive members of society. Assistive products are vital for people with disabilities, frailty and chronic illnesses; and for those with mental health problems, and gradual cognitive and physical decline characteristic of aging populations. This paper illustrates how the achievement of each of the 17 SDGs can be facilitated by the use of assistive products. Without promoting the availability of assistive products the SDGs cannot be achieved equitably. We highlight how assistive products can be considered as both a mediator and a moderator of SDG achievement. We also briefly describe how the Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE) is working to promote greater access to assistive products on a global scale.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Burden of Chronic Wounds in the UK

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                24 March 2021
                April 2021
                : 18
                : 7
                : 3338
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Health Research Institute, Health Implementation Science and Technology (HIST), University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
                [2 ]School of Health and Sport Science, University of the Sunshine Coast Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia
                [3 ]Assisting Living and Learning Institute (ALL), Maynooth University, W23 VP22 Co. Kildare, Ireland
                [4 ]School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd LL57 2EF, UK; n.bray@ 123456bangor.ac.uk
                [5 ]Department of Rehabilitation Sciences & Technology, University of Pittsburgh & International Society of Wheelchair Professionals, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA; mgoldberg@ 123456pitt.edu (M.G.); jpearlman@ 123456pitt.edu (J.P.)
                [6 ]École de Réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada; paula.rushton@ 123456umontreal.ca
                [7 ]CHU Sainte Justine Research Centre, Montréal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada
                [8 ]Unité des Aides Technique, SESOBEL, Ain El Rihani, Lebanon; aidestechniques@ 123456sesobel.org
                [9 ]MBE, Founder Director, Motivation UK/International, Bristol BS3 4EG, UK; Constantine@ 123456motivation.org.uk
                [10 ]Mobility India, Rehabilitation Research and Training Centre, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru 560078, India; ritugm@ 123456mobility-india.org
                [11 ]ICFAI University, Jharkhand 835222, India
                [12 ]International Society of Wheelchair Professionals, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: rosie.gowran@ 123456ul.ie
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-5815
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-0477
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-9136
                Article
                ijerph-18-03338
                10.3390/ijerph18073338
                8036353
                33804868
                3efa57e4-855f-4ca3-afa5-f7d85d648f9b
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 March 2021
                : 18 March 2021
                Categories
                Commentary

                Public health
                appropriate wheelchairs,assistive technology,human security,sustainable development

                Comments

                Comment on this article