25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Benchmarking Quantum Chemical Methods: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Theoreticians and experimentalists should work together more closely to establish reliable rankings and benchmarks for quantum chemical methods. Comparison to carefully designed experimental benchmark data should be a priority. Guidelines to improve the situation for experiments and calculations are proposed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            General performance of density functionals.

            The density functional theory (DFT) foundations date from the 1920s with the work of Thomas and Fermi, but it was after the work of Hohenberg, Kohn, and Sham in the 1960s, and particularly with the appearance of the B3LYP functional in the early 1990s, that the widespread application of DFT has become a reality. DFT is less computationally demanding than other computational methods with a similar accuracy, being able to include electron correlation in the calculations at a fraction of time of post-Hartree-Fock methodologies. In this review we provide a brief outline of the density functional theory and of the historic development of the field, focusing later on the several types of density functionals currently available, and finishing with a detailed analysis of the performance of DFT across a wide range of chemical properties and system types, reviewed from the most recent benchmarking studies, which encompass several well-established density functionals together with the most recent efforts in the field. Globally, an overall picture of the level of performance of the plethora of currently available density functionals for each chemical property is drawn, with particular attention being dedicated to the relative performance of the popular B3LYP density functional.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the "Gold Standard," CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?

              We have quantified the effects of approximations usually made even in accurate CCSD(T)/CBS calculations of noncovalent interactions, often considered as the "gold standard" of computational chemistry. We have investigated the effect of excitation series truncation, frozen core approximation, and relativistic effects in a set of 24 model complexes. The final CCSD(T) results at the complete basis set limit with corrections to these approximations are the most accurate estimate of the true interaction energies in noncovalent complexes available. The average error due to these approximations was found to be about 1.5% of the interaction energy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rmata@gwdg.de
                msuhm@gwdg.de
                Journal
                Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
                Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl
                10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
                ANIE
                Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English)
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1433-7851
                1521-3773
                28 April 2017
                04 September 2017
                : 56
                : 37 , Jubilee Issue 150 Years of the GDCh ( doiID: 10.1002/anie.v56.37 )
                : 11011-11018
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institut für Physikalische Chemie Universität Göttingen Tammannstrasse 6 37077 Göttingen Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2720-3364
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8841-7705
                Article
                ANIE201611308
                10.1002/anie.201611308
                5582598
                28452424
                3efcbcef-b709-4b03-a5f0-71038bd39906
                © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 21 November 2016
                : 20 December 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, References: 89, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Stiftung der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
                Categories
                Essay
                Essays
                Quantum Chemical Methodology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                anie201611308
                September 4, 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.9 mode:remove_FC converted:04.09.2017

                Chemistry
                benchmarking,experiments,quantum chemistry,theory
                Chemistry
                benchmarking, experiments, quantum chemistry, theory

                Comments

                Comment on this article