25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reliability of the ICRP's dose coefficients for members of the public. 1. Sources of uncertainty in the biokinetic models.

      1
      Radiation protection dosimetry
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During the decade following the Chernobyl accident, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) developed dose coefficients (doses per unit intake) for ingestion or inhalation of radionuclides by members of the public. The level of uncertainty in those coefficients varies considerably from one radionuclide to another, due largely to differences in the level of understanding of the biological behaviour of different elements in the human body. This paper is the first in a series that examines the sources and extent of uncertainties in the ICRP's biokinetic and dosimetric models for members of the public and the dose coefficients derived from those models. The present paper describes the different types of information generally used to develop biokinetic models for radionuclides, the main sources of uncertainty associated with each type of information, and the approach used in subsequent papers in this series to quantify the uncertainties in biokinetic and dosimetric estimates.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Radiat Prot Dosimetry
          Radiation protection dosimetry
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0144-8420
          0144-8420
          2001
          : 95
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA. rwl@ornl.gov
          Article
          10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006543
          11605794
          3f23f3d1-66a3-49d7-864e-79f107b543f3
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article