84
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Felon Disenfranchisement

      1 , 1 , 1
      Annual Review of Law and Social Science
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Crime control and prisons have featured prominently in electoral campaigns, yet currently and formerly incarcerated people are a profoundly disenfranchised constituency in the United States. This article examines the extent to which this population and its concerns have been excluded from American electoral politics. Starting with the philosophical debate on the extent of the right to vote, the article examines the scope of felon disenfranchisement in the United States, including comparative perspectives, policies in states that allow voting within prisons, and eligibility to run for office with a criminal record. The article also examines the problematic underlying issue of racial exclusion via felon disenfranchisement; the impact of disenfranchisement on civic engagement and recidivism; and the perspectives of disenfranchised, formerly incarcerated people. The article ends with thoughts on the prospects of bipartisan reform of voting rights.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          He's Stealing My Issues! Clinton's Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Meta-Analysis of Public Attitudes Toward Ex-Offenders

            Ex-offenders face barriers to community reintegration including negative attitudes held by members of the public. This meta-analysis summarizes the extant research on the correlates of public attitudes toward ex-offenders—namely, public, ex-offender, and community characteristics—and the moderating effects of sexual offense history. A systematic search of four databases (PsycINFO, Web of Science, National Criminal Justice Reference Service [NCJRS], and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses) identified 19 records, consisting of 9,355 participants. Results revealed small associations between correlate variables and attitudes, suggesting that people are more similar than different in their attitudes toward ex-offenders. Indeed, only political ideology, interpersonal contact, and sexual offense history emerged as significant correlates. Moderation analyses revealed differences in public attitudes toward ex-offenders based upon the year a record was produced. Findings reveal the need for additional research examining moderators of public attitudes toward ex-offenders and suggest that interventions should explore ways to incorporate interpersonal contact and reduce stigma related to criminal histories.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The past as prologue?

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Annual Review of Law and Social Science
                Annu. Rev. Law. Soc. Sci.
                Annual Reviews
                1550-3585
                1550-3631
                October 13 2017
                October 13 2017
                : 13
                : 1
                : 295-311
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hastings College of the Law, University of California, San Francisco, California 94102;, ,
                Article
                10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113558
                3f3575e1-3095-4538-8867-4e17e86c0e27
                © 2017

                http://www.annualreviews.org/licenses/tdm

                History

                Social policy & Welfare,Political science,Psychology,Law
                Social policy & Welfare, Political science, Psychology, Law

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log