7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Use of respiratory biofeedback and CLAWS for increased navigator efficiency for imaging the thoracic aorta.

      Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
      Adult, Algorithms, Aorta, Thoracic, anatomy & histology, Artifacts, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, methods, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Respiratory Mechanics, Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques, Sensitivity and Specificity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A novel technique to guide a subjects' breathing pattern using a respiratory biofeedback (rBF) "game" to improve respiratory efficiency is presented. The continuously adaptive windowing strategy, a fully automatic and highly efficient free-breathing navigator gated technique, is used to acquire the data as it ensures that all potential navigator acceptance windows are possible. This enables the rBF to be fully adaptable to a subject's respiratory pattern. Images of the thoracic aorta acquired using balanced steady-state free precession with continuously adaptive windowing strategy respiratory motion control, with and without rBF, were compared in 10 healthy subjects. Total scan time was reduced by using rBF. The mean scan time was reduced from 7 min 44 s (463 cardiac cycles, ± 127 cc) without rBF to 5 min 43 s (380 cardiac cycles, ± 118 cc) with the use of rBF (P < 0.05). Respiratory efficiency was increased from 45% without rBF to 56% with rBF (P < 0.01). Image quality was the same for both techniques (P = ns). In conclusion, rBF significantly improved respiratory efficiency and reduced acquisition duration without affecting image quality. Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article