17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Inferior Vena Cava to Determine Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fluid responsiveness is the ability to increase the cardiac output in response to a fluid challenge. Only about 50% of patients receiving fluid resuscitation for acute circulatory failure increase their stroke volume, but the other 50% may worsen their outcome. Therefore, predicting fluid responsiveness is needed. In this purpose, in recent years, the assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) through ultrasound (US) has become very popular. The aim of our work was to systematically review all the previously published studies assessing the accuracy of the diameter of IVC or its respiratory variations measured through US in predicting fluid responsiveness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy.

          To investigate whether the respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter (DeltaD(IVC)) could be related to fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Prospective clinical study. Medical ICU of a non-university hospital. Mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (n=39). Volume loading with 8 mL/kg of 6% hydroxyethylstarch over 20 min. Cardiac output and DeltaD(IVC) were assessed by echography before and immediately after the standardized volume load. Volume loading induced an increase in cardiac output from 5.7+/-2.0 to 6.4+/-1.9 L/min (P or =15% (responders). Before volume loading, the DeltaD(IVC) was greater in responders than in non-responders (25+/-15 vs 6+/-4%, P<0.001), closely correlated with the increase in cardiac output (r=0.82, P<0.001), and a 12% DeltaD(IVC) cut-off value allowed identification of responders with positive and negative predictive values of 93% and 92%, respectively. Analysis of DeltaD(IVC) is a simple and non-invasive method to detect fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bayesian computing with INLA: New features

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients.

              To evaluate the extent to which respiratory changes in inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter can be used to predict fluid responsiveness. Prospective clinical study. Hospital intensive care unit. Twenty-three patients with acute circulatory failure related to sepsis and mechanically ventilated because of an acute lung injury. Inferior vena cava diameter (D) at end-expiration (Dmin) and at end-inspiration (Dmax) was measured by echocardiography using a subcostal approach. The distensibility index of the IVC (dIVC) was calculated as the ratio of Dmax - Dmin / Dmin, and expressed as a percentage. The Doppler technique was applied in the pulmonary artery trunk to determine cardiac index (CI). Measurements were performed at baseline and after a 7 ml/kg volume expansion using a plasma expander. Patients were separated into responders (increase in CI > or =15%) and non-responders (increase in CI <15%). Using a threshold dIVC of 18%, responders and non-responders were discriminated with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity. A strong relation (r = 0.9) was observed between dIVC at baseline and the CI increase following blood volume expansion. Baseline central venous pressure did not accurately predict fluid responsiveness. Our study suggests that respiratory change in IVC diameter is an accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
                J Intensive Care Med
                SAGE Publications
                0885-0666
                1525-1489
                January 17 2018
                January 17 2018
                : 088506661775230
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedale Civile di Latisana (UD), A.A.S. 2 “Bassa Friulana–Isontina,” Latisana, Udine, Italy
                [2 ]Division of Pre-Hospital and Retrieval Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, ASUIUD “Santa Maria della Misericordia,” Udine, Italy
                Article
                10.1177/0885066617752308
                29343170
                3f478e39-e599-48b7-8e14-fdd9491cc25d
                © 2018

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article