13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health policy and systems research publications in Latin America warrant the launching of a new specialised regional journal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Scientific journals play a critical role in research validation and dissemination and are increasingly vocal about the identification of research priorities and the targeting of research results to key audiences. No new journals specialising in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and focusing in the developing world or in a specific developing world region have been established since the early 1980s. This paper compares the growth of publications on HPSR across Latin America and the world and explores the potential, feasibility and challenges of innovative publication strategies.

          Methods

          A bibliometric analysis was undertaken using HPSR MeSH terms with journals indexed in Medline. A survey was undertaken among 2500 authors publishing on HPSR in Latin America (LA) through an online survey, with a 13.1% response rate. Aggregate indicators were constructed and validated, and two-way ANOVA tests were performed on key variables.

          Results

          HPSR publications on LA observed an average annual growth of 27.5% from the years 2000 to 2018, as against 11.4% worldwide and yet a lag on papers published per capita. A total of 48 journals with an Impact Factor publish HPSR on LA, of which 5 non-specialised journals are published in the region and are ranked in the bottom quintile of Impact Factor. While the majority of HPSR papers worldwide is published in specialised HPSR journals, in LA this is the minority. Very few researchers from LA sit in the Editorial Board of international journals. Researchers highly support strengthening quality HPSR publications through publishing in open access, on-line journals with a focus on the LA region and with peer reviewers specialized on the region. Researchers would support a new open access journal specializing in the LA region and in HPSR, publishing in English. Open access up-front costs and disincentives while waiting for an Impact Factor can be overcome.

          Conclusion

          Researchers publishing on HPSR in LA widely support the launching of a new specialised journal for the region with a vigorous editorial policy focusing on regional and country priorities. Strategies should be in place to support English-language publishing and to develop a community of practice around the publication process. In the first years, special issues should be promoted through a priority-setting process to attract prominent authors, develop the audience and attain an Impact Factor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index

          The growth rate of scientific publication has been studied from 1907 to 2007 using available data from a number of literature databases, including Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). Traditional scientific publishing, that is publication in peer-reviewed journals, is still increasing although there are big differences between fields. There are no indications that the growth rate has decreased in the last 50 years. At the same time publication using new channels, for example conference proceedings, open archives and home pages, is growing fast. The growth rate for SCI up to 2007 is smaller than for comparable databases. This means that SCI was covering a decreasing part of the traditional scientific literature. There are also clear indications that the coverage by SCI is especially low in some of the scientific areas with the highest growth rate, including computer science and engineering sciences. The role of conference proceedings, open access archives and publications published on the net is increasing, especially in scientific fields with high growth rates, but this has only partially been reflected in the databases. The new publication channels challenge the use of the big databases in measurements of scientific productivity or output and of the growth rate of science. Because of the declining coverage and this challenge it is problematic that SCI has been used and is used as the dominant source for science indicators based on publication and citation numbers. The limited data available for social sciences show that the growth rate in SSCI was remarkably low and indicate that the coverage by SSCI was declining over time. National Science Indicators from Thomson Reuters is based solely on SCI, SSCI and Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI). Therefore the declining coverage of the citation databases problematizes the use of this source.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection

            Background Knowledge translation platforms (KTPs), which are partnerships between policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers, are being established in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to enhance evidence-informed health policymaking (EIHP). This study aims to gain a better understanding of the i) activities conducted by KTPs, ii) the way in which KTP leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders perceive these activities and their outputs, iii) facilitators that support KTP work and challenges, and the lessons learned for overcoming such challenges, and iv) factors that can help to ensure the sustainability of KTPs. Methods This paper triangulated qualitative data from: i) 17 semi-structured interviews with 47 key informants including KTP leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders from 10 KTPs; ii) document reviews, and iii) observation of deliberations at the International Forum on EIHP in LMICs held in Addis Ababa in August 2012. Purposive sampling was used and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Deliberative dialogues informed by evidence briefs were identified as the most commendable tools by interviewees for enhancing EIHP. KTPs reported that they have contributed to increased awareness of the importance of EIHP and strengthened relationships among policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers. Support from policymakers and international funders facilitated KTP activities, while the lack of skilled human resources to conduct EIHP activities impeded KTPs. Ensuring the sustainability of EIHP initiatives after the end of funding was a major challenge for KTPs. KTPs reported that institutionalization within the government has helped to retain human resources and secure funding, whereas KTPs hosted by universities highlighted the advantage of autonomy from political interests. Conclusions The establishment of KTPs is a promising development in supporting EIHP. Real-time lesson drawing from the experiences of KTPs can support improvements in the functioning of KTPs in the short term, while making the case for sustaining their work in the long term. Lessons learned can help to promote similar EIHP initiatives in other countries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                miguel.gonzalezblock@gmail.com
                Journal
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Research Policy and Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-4505
                5 June 2020
                5 June 2020
                2020
                : 18
                : 59
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.440977.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0483 7094, Universidad Anáhuac, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, ; Mexico City, Mexico
                [2 ]GRID grid.440592.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 3308, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Escuela de Gobierno y Políticas Públicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, ; Lima, Peru
                [3 ]GRID grid.7345.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0056 1981, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la UBA, Buenos Aires & Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política, ; Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [4 ]GRID grid.443909.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 4466, Escuela de Salud Pública, Universidad de Chile, ; Santiago, Chile
                [5 ]GRID grid.440787.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9702 069X, Centro de Estudios en Protección Social y Economía de la Salud, Universidad ICESI, ; Cali, Colombia
                [6 ]GRID grid.8532.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2200 7498, Departamento de Medicina Social, , Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, ; Porto Alegre, Brazil
                [7 ]GRID grid.3575.4, ISNI 0000000121633745, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, , World Health Organization, ; Geneva, Switzerland
                [8 ]GRID grid.42707.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1766 9560, Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Veracruzana, ; Xalapa, Veracruz Mexico
                [9 ]GRID grid.412889.e, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0706, Universidad de Costa Rica, ; San Jose, Costa Rica
                [10 ]Evisys Consulting, Mexico City, Mexico
                [11 ]GRID grid.9486.3, ISNI 0000 0001 2159 0001, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, ; Mexico City, Mexico
                Article
                565
                10.1186/s12961-020-00565-1
                7275341
                32503569
                3f5c4eb2-7aa2-448b-93e5-b978042ac9f9
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 20 September 2019
                : 28 April 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                health policy and systems research,health research capacity strengthening,scientometrics,latin america

                Comments

                Comment on this article