34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A classification prognostic score to predict OS in stage IV well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 11 , 14 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 15 , 23 , 18 , 24 , 22 , 25 , 2 , NEPscore Working Group NEPscore Working Group, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
      Endocrine-Related Cancer
      Bioscientifica Ltd
      neuroendocrine tumors, overall survival, prognosis, prognostic score, validation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          No validated prognostic tool is available for predicting overall survival (OS) of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs). This study, conducted in three independent cohorts of patients from five different European countries, aimed to develop and validate a classification prognostic score for OS in patients with stage IV WDNETs. We retrospectively collected data on 1387 patients: (i) patients treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy; n = 515); (ii) European cohort of rare NET patients included in the European RARECAREnet database ( n = 457); (iii) Italian multicentric cohort of pancreatic NET (pNETs) patients treated at 24 Italian institutions ( n = 415). The score was developed using data from patients included in cohort (i) (training set); external validation was performed by applying the score to the data of the two independent cohorts (ii) and (iii) evaluating both calibration and discriminative ability (Harrell C statistic). We used data on age, primary tumor site, metastasis (synchronous vs metachronous), Ki-67, functional status and primary surgery to build the score, which was developed for classifying patients into three groups with differential 10-year OS: (I) favorable risk group: 10-year OS ≥70%; (II) intermediate risk group: 30% ≤ 10-year OS < 70%; (III) poor risk group: 10-year OS <30%. The Harrell C statistic was 0.661 in the training set, and 0.626 and 0.601 in the RARECAREnet and Italian multicentric validation sets, respectively. In conclusion, based on the analysis of three ‘field-practice’ cohorts collected in different settings, we defined and validated a prognostic score to classify patients into three groups with different long-term prognoses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases

          Many management strategies exist for neuroendocrine liver metastases. These strategies range from surgery to ablation with various interventional radiology procedures, and include both regional and systemic therapy with diverse biological, cytotoxic, or targeted agents. A paucity of biological, molecular, and genomic information and an absence of data from rigorous trials limit the validity of many publications detailing management. This Review represents the views from an international conference, for which 15 expert working groups prepared evidence-based assessments addressing specific questions, and from which an independent jury derived final recommendations. The aim of the conference was to review the existing approaches to neuroendocrine liver metastases, assess the evidence on which management decisions were based, develop internationally acceptable recommendations for clinical practice (when evidence was available), and make recommendations for clinical and research endeavours. This report represents the final clinical statements and proposals for future research.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors (PROMID): Results of Long-Term Survival

            Background: Somatostatin analogs have been shown to control the growth of well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Their effect on overall survival is a matter of debate. We analyzed the prognostic significance of early treatment with octreotide LAR and of hepatic tumor load in the PROMID trial cohort. Patients and Methods: Between 2001 and 2008, 85 treatment-naïve patients were randomly assigned to monthly octreotide LAR 30 mg or placebo until tumor progression or death. Post-study treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. Upon disease progression, 38 out of 43 placebo patients (88.4%) received octreotide LAR. For survival, patients were followed until May 2014. Results: Forty-eight out of 85 patients (56.5%) died. In 38 patients (79.2%), death was tumor related. The median overall survival (84.7 and 83.7 months) was only slightly different in patients assigned to octreotide and placebo [HR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.47-1.46); p = 0.51]. The median overall survival was 84.7 months for all 85 patients, 107.6 months in the low-tumor-load (n = 64) and 57.5 months in the high-tumor-load (n = 21) subgroups [HR = 2.49 (95% CI: 1.36-4.55); p = 0.002]. There was a trend towards improved overall survival in patients with a low hepatic tumor load receiving octreotide compared to placebo [‘median not reached' and 87.2 months; HR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.29-1.2); p = 0.142]. Conclusion: The extent of tumor burden is a predictor for shorter survival. Overall survival was similar in patients receiving octreotide LAR or placebo treatment at randomization. Crossover of the majority of placebo patients to octreotide LAR may have confounded the data on overall survival.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Activity of sunitinib in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

              Standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited efficacy in metastatic neuroendocrine tumor patients. Neuroendocrine tumors express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR). Sunitinib malate, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has activity against VEGFRs as well as platelet-derived growth factor receptors, stem-cell factor receptor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3. We evaluated the efficacy of sunitinib in a two-cohort, phase II study of advanced carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients. Patients were treated with repeated 6-week cycles of oral sunitinib (50 mg/d for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment). Patients were observed for response, survival, and adverse events. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Among 109 enrolled patients, 107 received sunitinib (carcinoid, n = 41; pancreatic endocrine tumor, n = 66). Overall objective response rate (ORR) in pancreatic endocrine tumor patients was 16.7% (11 of 66 patients), and 68% (45 of 66 patients) had stable disease (SD). Among carcinoid patients, ORR was 2.4% (one of 41 patients), and 83% (34 of 41 patients) had SD. Median time to tumor progression was 7.7 months in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients and 10.2 months in carcinoid patients. One-year survival rate was 81.1% in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients and 83.4% in carcinoid patients. No significant differences from baseline in patient-reported quality of life or fatigue were observed during treatment. Sunitinib has antitumor activity in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; its activity against carcinoid tumors could not be definitively determined in this nonrandomized study. Randomized trials of sunitinib in patients with neuroendocrine tumors are warranted.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endocr Relat Cancer
                Endocr. Relat. Cancer
                ERC
                Endocrine-Related Cancer
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                1351-0088
                1479-6821
                June 2018
                20 March 2018
                : 25
                : 6
                : 607-618
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Oncology ENETS Center of Excellence Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
                [2 ]Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Pathology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
                [5 ]University of Milan Milan, Italy
                [6 ]Liver Surgery Transplantation and Gastroenterology, University of Milan and Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione IRCCS, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milano, Milan, Italy
                [7 ]Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
                [8 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine ENETS Center of Excellence Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Milan, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Medical Gastroenterology Azienda Ospedaliera Sant’Andrea, Roma ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
                [10 ]Department of Medical Oncology Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
                [11 ]Department of Medical Oncology Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy
                [12 ]Department of Medical Oncology Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy
                [13 ]Department of Medical Oncology Policlinico Sant’Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
                [14 ]Ireland National Cancer Registry Cork, Ireland
                [15 ]Department of Medical Oncology IEO – Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
                [16 ]Department of Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery Unit Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, ENETS Center of Excellence, Naples, Italy
                [17 ]Department of Medical Oncology IOM – Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Catania, Italy
                [18 ]Belgian Cancer Registry Brussels, Belgium
                [19 ]Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRST, IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
                [20 ]Department of Medical Oncology Ospedale Santa Chiara, Pisa, Italy
                [21 ]Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
                [22 ]Institute of Oncology Ljubljana Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [23 ]Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Pascale, ENETS Center of Excellence, Naples, Italy
                [24 ]Department of Research Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [25 ]Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to S Pusceddu: sara.pusceddu@ 123456istitutotumori.mi.it
                Article
                ERC170489
                10.1530/ERC-17-0489
                5920017
                29559553
                3f8e2d40-67b3-400f-b4b0-24f4436d5f8a
                © 2018 The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 15 March 2018
                : 20 March 2018
                Categories
                Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                neuroendocrine tumors,overall survival,prognosis,prognostic score,validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log