14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contrasting effects of visiting urban green-space and the countryside on biodiversity knowledge and conservation support

      research-article
      * ,
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Conservation policy frequently assumes that increasing people’s exposure to green-space enhances their knowledge of the natural world and desire to protect it. Urban development is, however, considered to be driving declining connectedness to nature. Despite this the evidence base supporting the assumption that visiting green-spaces promotes biodiversity knowledge and conservation support, and the impacts of urbanization on these relationships, is surprisingly limited. Using data from door-to-door surveys of nearly 300 residents in three pairs of small and large urban areas in England we demonstrate that people who visit green-space more regularly have higher biodiversity knowledge and support for conservation (measured using scales of pro-environmental behavior). Crucially these relationships only arise when considering visits to the countryside and not the frequency of visits to urban green-space. These patterns are robust to a suite of confounding variables including nature orientated motivations for visiting green-space, socio-economic and demographic factors, garden-use and engagement with natural history programs. Despite this the correlations that we uncover cannot unambiguously demonstrate that visiting the countryside improves biodiversity knowledge and conservation support. We consider it likely, however, that two mechanisms operate through a positive feedback loop i.e. increased visits to green-space promote an interest in and knowledge of biodiversity and support for conservation, which in turn further increase the desire to visit green-space and experience nature. The intensity of urbanization around peoples’ homes, but not city size, is negatively associated with their frequency of countryside visits and biodiversity knowledge. Designing less intensely urbanized cities with good access to the countryside, combined with conservation policies that promote access to the countryside thus seems likely to maximize urban residents’ biodiversity knowledge and support for conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking.

          The metabolic energy cost of walking is determined, to a large degree, by body mass, but it is not clear how body composition and mass distribution influence this cost. We tested the hypothesis that walking would be most expensive for obese women compared with obese men and normal-weight women and men. Furthermore, we hypothesized that for all groups, preferred walking speed would correspond to the speed that minimized the gross energy cost per distance. We measured body composition, maximal oxygen consumption, and preferred walking speed of 39 (19 class II obese, 20 normal weight) women and men. We also measured oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production while the subjects walked on a level treadmill at six speeds (0.50-1.75 m/s). Both obesity and sex affected the net metabolic rate (W/kg) of walking. Net metabolic rates of obese subjects were only approximately 10% greater (per kg) than for normal-weight subjects, and net metabolic rates for women were approximately 10% greater than for men. The increase in net metabolic rate at faster walking speeds was greatest in obese women compared with the other groups. Preferred walking speed was not different across groups (1.42 m/s) and was near the speed that minimized gross energy cost per distance. Surprisingly, mass distribution (thigh mass/body mass) was not related to net metabolic rate, but body composition (% fat) was (r2= 0.43). Detailed biomechanical studies of walking are needed to investigate whether obese individuals adopt novel energy saving mechanisms during walking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                23 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 3
                : e0174376
                Affiliations
                [001]Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, United Kingdom
                University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: DFC KLE.

                • Data curation: DFC.

                • Formal analysis: DFC.

                • Funding acquisition: KLE.

                • Investigation: DFC.

                • Methodology: DFC KLE.

                • Project administration: DFC.

                • Supervision: KLE.

                • Writing – original draft: DFC.

                • Writing – review & editing: KLE.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-25820
                10.1371/journal.pone.0174376
                5363982
                28334034
                3f94c41c-6556-4405-8a12-ea584efb51ed
                © 2017 Coldwell, Evans

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 28 June 2016
                : 8 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270, Natural Environment Research Council;
                Award ID: NE/K500914/1
                Award Recipient :
                This work was funded with a studentship award [NE/K500914/1] to KLE from the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Sustainability (BESS, http://www.nerc-bess.net/) program with CASE partner funding from Natural England’s Dark Peak Nature Improvement Area through, and with support from, Moors for the Future Partnership ( http://www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk/). BESS is a six year program (2011–2017) funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council ( http://www.nerc.ac.uk/) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council ( http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/) as part of the UK’s Living with Environmental Change program. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the BESS Directorate or NERC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Geographic Areas
                Urban Areas
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Urban Environments
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Conservation Biology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Conservation Science
                Conservation Biology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Urban Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Urban Ecology
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Algebra
                Linear Algebra
                Eigenvalues
                Custom metadata
                Data cannot be made publicly available in order to protect participant confidentiality. These restrictions were imposed by the University Research Ethics Committee (UREC). In order to access the data, interested researchers may contact the authors at karl.evans@ 123456sheffield.ac.uk or the UREC chair Peter Bath via his secretary Lindsay Unwin at l.v.unwin@ 123456sheffield.ac.uk .

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article