8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Reactivity and Selectivity Differences between Catecholate and Catechothiolate Ru Complexes. Implications Regarding Design of Stereoselective Olefin Metathesis Catalysts

      , ,
      Journal of the American Chemical Society
      American Chemical Society (ACS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The origins of the unexpected finding that Ru catechothiolate complexes, in contrast to catecholate derivatives, promote exceptional Z-selective olefin metathesis reactions are elucidated. We show that species containing a catechothiolate ligand, unlike catecholates, preserve their structural integrity under commonly used reaction conditions. DFT calculations indicate that, whereas alkene coordination is the stereochemistry-determining step with catecholate complexes, it is through the metallacyclobutane formation that the identity of the major isomer is determined with catechothiolate systems. The present findings suggest that previous models for Z selectivity, largely based on steric differences, should be altered to incorporate electronic factors as well.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of the American Chemical Society
          J. Am. Chem. Soc.
          American Chemical Society (ACS)
          0002-7863
          1520-5126
          October 15 2014
          September 30 2014
          : 136
          : 41
          : 14337-14340
          Article
          10.1021/ja505961z
          25268949
          3f9e5941-c97e-4c9d-ae57-429a6d31a336
          © 2014
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article