46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Worldwide, human appropriation of ecosystems is disrupting plant–pollinator communities and pollination function through habitat conversion and landscape homogenisation. Conversion to agriculture is destroying and degrading semi‐natural ecosystems while conventional land‐use intensification (e.g. industrial management of large‐scale monocultures with high chemical inputs) homogenises landscape structure and quality. Together, these anthropogenic processes reduce the connectivity of populations and erode floral and nesting resources to undermine pollinator abundance and diversity, and ultimately pollination services. Ecological intensification of agriculture represents a strategic alternative to ameliorate these drivers of pollinator decline while supporting sustainable food production, by promoting biodiversity beneficial to agricultural production through management practices such as intercropping, crop rotations, farm‐level diversification and reduced agrochemical use. We critically evaluate its potential to address and reverse the land use and management trends currently degrading pollinator communities and potentially causing widespread pollination deficits. We find that many of the practices that constitute ecological intensification can contribute to mitigating the drivers of pollinator decline. Our findings support ecological intensification as a solution to pollinator declines, and we discuss ways to promote it in agricultural policy and practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references229

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.

          Rising demands for agricultural products will increase pressure to further intensify crop production, while negative environmental impacts have to be minimized. Ecological intensification entails the environmentally friendly replacement of anthropogenic inputs and/or enhancement of crop productivity, by including regulating and supporting ecosystem services management in agricultural practices. Effective ecological intensification requires an understanding of the relations between land use at different scales and the community composition of ecosystem service-providing organisms above and below ground, and the flow, stability, contribution to yield, and management costs of the multiple services delivered by these organisms. Research efforts and investments are particularly needed to reduce existing yield gaps by integrating context-appropriate bundles of ecosystem services into crop production systems. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.

            Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes can be increased with conversion of some production lands into 'more-natural'- unmanaged or extensively managed - lands. However, it remains unknown to what extent biodiversity can be enhanced by altering landscape pattern without reducing agricultural production. We propose a framework for this problem, considering separately compositional heterogeneity (the number and proportions of different cover types) and configurational heterogeneity (the spatial arrangement of cover types). Cover type classification and mapping is based on species requirements, such as feeding and nesting, resulting in measures of 'functional landscape heterogeneity'. We then identify three important questions: does biodiversity increase with (1) increasing heterogeneity of the more-natural areas, (2) increasing compositional heterogeneity of production cover types and (3) increasing configurational heterogeneity of production cover types? We discuss approaches for addressing these questions. Such studies should have high priority because biodiversity protection globally depends increasingly on maintaining biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Decline and conservation of bumble bees.

              Declines in bumble bee species in the past 60 years are well documented in Europe, where they are driven primarily by habitat loss and declines in floral abundance and diversity resulting from agricultural intensification. Impacts of habitat degradation and fragmentation are likely to be compounded by the social nature of bumble bees and their largely monogamous breeding system, which renders their effective population size low. Hence, populations are susceptible to stochastic extinction events and inbreeding. In North America, catastrophic declines of some bumble bee species since the 1990s are probably attributable to the accidental introduction of a nonnative parasite from Europe, a result of global trade in domesticated bumble bee colonies used for pollination of greenhouse crops. Given the importance of bumble bees as pollinators of crops and wildflowers, steps must be taken to prevent further declines. Suggested measures include tight regulation of commercial bumble bee use and targeted use of environmentally comparable schemes to enhance floristic diversity in agricultural landscapes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kovacs.aniko@okologia.mta.hu
                Journal
                Ecol Lett
                Ecol. Lett
                10.1111/(ISSN)1461-0248
                ELE
                Ecology Letters
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1461-023X
                1461-0248
                27 March 2017
                May 2017
                : 20
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/ele.2017.20.issue-5 )
                : 673-689
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] MTA Centre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group Alkotmány u. 2‐4. 2163 Vácrátót Hungary
                [ 2 ] MTA Centre for Ecological Research GINOP Sustainable Ecosystems Group Klebelsberg Kuno u. 3. 8237 Tihany Hungary
                [ 3 ] Department of Biological Sciences Life Sciences South 252 University of Idaho Moscow ID 83844‐3051 USA
                [ 4 ] NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Bush Estate, Penicuik Edinburgh EH26 0QB UK
                [ 5 ] UFZ ‐ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Dept. of Community Ecology Theodor‐Lieser‐Str. 4, 06120 Halle Germany
                [ 6 ] iDiv German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig Germany
                [ 7 ] Institute of Biological Sciences College of Arts and Sciences University of the Philippines Los Banos, College Laguna 4031 Philippines
                [ 8 ] University of California 217 Wellman Hall Berkeley California 94720‐3114 CA USA
                [ 9 ] School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: E‐mail: kovacs.aniko@ 123456okologia.mta.hu
                [†]

                The authors equally contributed to this paper

                Article
                ELE12762
                10.1111/ele.12762
                6849539
                28346980
                3fbff33c-7de3-40b5-8902-082de671fe20
                © 2017 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 November 2016
                : 29 December 2016
                : 16 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 17, Words: 16197
                Funding
                Funded by: Swiss National Science Foundation , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001711;
                Award ID: P300P3_151141
                Award ID: PBNEP3_140192
                Funded by: NERC‐CEH National Capability Funding
                Award ID: NEC05106
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000270;
                Award ID: NE/K015419/1
                Award ID: NE/N014472/1
                Categories
                Review and Synthesis
                Review and Synthesis
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:12.11.2019

                Ecology
                crop production,diversification,food security,grazing/mowing intensity,habitat loss,landscape fragmentation,mass‐flowering crops,wild pollinator diversity

                Comments

                Comment on this article