12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Defining the burden of febrile illness in rural South and Southeast Asia: an open letter to announce the launch of the Rural Febrile Illness project

      letter
      a , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 1 , 3 , 11 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 12 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 13 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 14 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 15 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 10 , 16 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 7 , 1 , 11 , 1 , 10 , 1 , 3 , 17 , 18 , 1 , 3 , b , 1 , 3
      Wellcome Open Research
      F1000 Research Limited
      Community Health Workers, Etiology, Fever, Primary Health Care, Rural Health, Southeastern Asia, Telemedicine, Western Asia, Village Health Workers

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In rural areas of South and Southeast Asia malaria is declining but febrile illnesses still account for substantial morbidity and mortality. Village health workers (VHWs) are often the first point of contact with the formal health system, and for patients with febrile illnesses they can provide early diagnosis and treatment of malaria. However, for the majority of febrile patients, VHWs lack the training, support and resources to provide further care. Consequently, treatable bacterial illnesses are missed, antibiotics are overused and poorly targeted, and patient attendance wanes along with declining malaria.

          This Open Letter announces the start of a new initiative, the Rural Febrile Illness (RFI) project, the first in a series of projects to be implemented as part of the South and Southeast Asian Community-based Trials Network (SEACTN) research programme. This multi-country, multi-site project will begin in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar and will define the epidemiological baseline of febrile illness in five remote and underserved areas of Asia where malaria endemicity is declining and access to health services is limited.

          The RFI project aims to determine the incidence, causes and outcomes of febrile illness; understand the opportunities, barriers and appetite for adjustment of the role of VHWs to include management of non-malarial febrile illnesses; and establish a network of community healthcare providers and facilities capable of implementing interventions designed to triage, diagnose and treat patients presenting with febrile illnesses within these communities in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

          Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum has emerged in Southeast Asia and now poses a threat to the control and elimination of malaria. Mapping the geographic extent of resistance is essential for planning containment and elimination strategies. Between May 2011 and April 2013, we enrolled 1241 adults and children with acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria in an open-label trial at 15 sites in 10 countries (7 in Asia and 3 in Africa). Patients received artesunate, administered orally at a daily dose of either 2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day or 4 mg per kilogram, for 3 days, followed by a standard 3-day course of artemisinin-based combination therapy. Parasite counts in peripheral-blood samples were measured every 6 hours, and the parasite clearance half-lives were determined. The median parasite clearance half-lives ranged from 1.9 hours in the Democratic Republic of Congo to 7.0 hours at the Thailand-Cambodia border. Slowly clearing infections (parasite clearance half-life >5 hours), strongly associated with single point mutations in the "propeller" region of the P. falciparum kelch protein gene on chromosome 13 (kelch13), were detected throughout mainland Southeast Asia from southern Vietnam to central Myanmar. The incidence of pretreatment and post-treatment gametocytemia was higher among patients with slow parasite clearance, suggesting greater potential for transmission. In western Cambodia, where artemisinin-based combination therapies are failing, the 6-day course of antimalarial therapy was associated with a cure rate of 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 90.9 to 99.4) at 42 days. Artemisinin resistance to P. falciparum, which is now prevalent across mainland Southeast Asia, is associated with mutations in kelch13. Prolonged courses of artemisinin-based combination therapies are currently efficacious in areas where standard 3-day treatments are failing. (Funded by the U.K. Department of International Development and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01350856.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories.

            In the last decade, as a result of the widespread use of PCR and DNA sequencing, 16S rDNA sequencing has played a pivotal role in the accurate identification of bacterial isolates and the discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. For bacterial identification, 16S rDNA sequencing is particularly important in the case of bacteria with unusual phenotypic profiles, rare bacteria, slow-growing bacteria, uncultivable bacteria and culture-negative infections. Not only has it provided insights into aetiologies of infectious disease, but it also helps clinicians in choosing antibiotics and in determining the duration of treatment and infection control procedures. With the use of 16S rDNA sequencing, 215 novel bacterial species, 29 of which belong to novel genera, have been discovered from human specimens in the past 7 years of the 21st century (2001-2007). One hundred of the 215 novel species, 15 belonging to novel genera, have been found in four or more subjects. The largest number of novel species discovered were of the genera Mycobacterium (n = 12) and Nocardia (n = 6). The oral cavity/dental-related specimens (n = 19) and the gastrointestinal tract (n = 26) were the most important sites for discovery and/or reservoirs of novel species. Among the 100 novel species, Streptococcus sinensis, Laribacter hongkongensis, Clostridium hathewayi and Borrelia spielmanii have been most thoroughly characterized, with the reservoirs and routes of transmission documented, and S. sinensis, L. hongkongensis and C. hathewayi have been found globally. One of the greatest hurdles in putting 16S rDNA sequencing into routine use in clinical microbiology laboratories is automation of the technology. The only step that can be automated at the moment is input of the 16S rDNA sequence of the bacterial isolate for identification into one of the software packages that will generate the result of the identity of the isolate on the basis of its sequence database. However, studies on the accuracy of the software packages have given highly varied results, and interpretation of results remains difficult for most technicians, and even for clinical microbiologists. To fully utilize 16S rDNA sequencing in clinical microbiology, better guidelines are needed for interpretation of the identification results, and additional/supplementary methods are necessary for bacterial species that cannot be identified confidently by 16S rDNA sequencing alone.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: what do we know about scaling up and sustainability?

              We sought to provide a systematic review of the determinants of success in scaling up and sustaining community health worker (CHW) programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We searched 11 electronic databases for academic literature published through December 2010 (n = 603 articles). Two independent reviewers applied exclusion criteria to identify articles that provided empirical evidence about the scale-up or sustainability of CHW programs in LMICs, then extracted data from each article by using a standardized form. We analyzed the resulting data for determinants and themes through iterated categorization. The final sample of articles (n = 19) present data on CHW programs in 16 countries. We identified 23 enabling factors and 15 barriers to scale-up and sustainability, which were grouped into 3 thematic categories: program design and management, community fit, and integration with the broader environment. Scaling up and sustaining CHW programs in LMICs requires effective program design and management, including adequate training, supervision, motivation, and funding; acceptability of the program to the communities served; and securing support for the program from political leaders and other health care providers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Data CurationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                26 March 2021
                2021
                : 6
                : 64
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [2 ]Cambodia Oxford Medical Research Unit, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia
                [3 ]Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [4 ]Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
                [5 ]Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [6 ]School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
                [7 ]Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
                [8 ]Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
                [9 ]University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [10 ]Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
                [11 ]Myanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Yangon, Myanmar
                [12 ]University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA
                [13 ]Health Nutrition and Population Programme, BRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [14 ]Savannakhet Provincial Health Department, Savannakhet, Lao People's Democratic Republic
                [15 ]Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
                [16 ]Institute of Research and Education Development, University of Health Sciences, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic
                [17 ]Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, USA
                [18 ]The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
                [1 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
                [1 ]Health Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-7922
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-9891
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-2084
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8017-8500
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-452X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-9347
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6717-8856
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-2166
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-8748
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6184-3381
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-9702
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5190-2395
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-1978
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-0745
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-4822
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-0562
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2309-1171
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0237-1070
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16393.1
                8080974
                34017924
                3fd4dd9c-15b3-4be2-a45a-654e50427ac0
                Copyright: © 2021 Chandna A et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
                Award ID: QSE-M-UNOPS-MORU-20864-007-42
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 215604
                This work is supported by Wellcome [219644]. The work in Cambodia is conducted as part of an RAI3E OR project, funded by the Global Fund [QSE-M-UNOPS-MORU-20864-007-42]. This diagnostics component of this partner project in Cambodia is supported by the Wellcome Trust.
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Open Letter
                Articles

                community health workers,etiology,fever,primary health care,rural health,southeastern asia,telemedicine,western asia,village health workers

                Comments

                Comment on this article