22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association of Patient Characteristics and Tumor Genomics With Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Using a Clinicogenomic Database

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e543">Question</h5> <p id="d1224779e545">Can clinical and genomic data obtained in routine clinical care be linked in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant manner to yield clinically relevant insights? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e548">Findings</h5> <p id="d1224779e550">A deidentified database of 28 998 patients with cancer, approximately 85% of whom were treated in a community setting, was generated by linking electronic health record–derived longitudinal clinical data with comprehensive tumor genomic profiling. Analysis of 4064 patients with non–small cell lung cancer revealed clinical, genomic, and therapeutic associations that were consistent with prior reports and extended previous observations on evolving community practice patterns. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e553">Meaning</h5> <p id="d1224779e555">Using data obtained from routine clinical care to generate a validated, multi-institution clinicogenomic database is feasible and can yield novel, clinically meaningful insights. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e559">Importance</h5> <p id="d1224779e561">Data sets linking comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to clinical outcomes may accelerate precision medicine. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e564">Objective</h5> <p id="d1224779e566">To assess whether a database that combines EHR-derived clinical data with CGP can identify and extend associations in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e569">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d1224779e571">Clinical data from EHRs were linked with CGP results for 28 998 patients from 275 US oncology practices. Among 4064 patients with NSCLC, exploratory associations between tumor genomics and patient characteristics with clinical outcomes were conducted, with data obtained between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2018. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e574">Exposures</h5> <p id="d1224779e576">Tumor CGP, including presence of a driver alteration (a pathogenic or likely pathogenic alteration in a gene shown to drive tumor growth); tumor mutation burden (TMB), defined as the number of mutations per megabase; and clinical characteristics gathered from EHRs. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e579">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d1224779e581">Overall survival (OS), time receiving therapy, maximal therapy response (as documented by the treating physician in the EHR), and clinical benefit rate (fraction of patients with stable disease, partial response, or complete response) to therapy. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e584">Results</h5> <p id="d1224779e586">Among 4064 patients with NSCLC (median age, 66.0 years; 51.9% female), 3183 (78.3%) had a history of smoking, 3153 (77.6%) had nonsquamous cancer, and 871 (21.4%) had an alteration in <i>EGFR</i>, <i>ALK</i>, or <i>ROS1</i> (701 [17.2%] with <i>EGFR</i>, 128 [3.1%] with <i>ALK</i>, and 42 [1.0%] with <i>ROS1 </i>alterations). There were 1946 deaths in 7 years. For patients with a driver alteration, improved OS was observed among those treated with (n = 575) vs not treated with (n = 560) targeted therapies (median, 18.6 months [95% CI, 15.2-21.7] vs 11.4 months [95% CI, 9.7-12.5] from advanced diagnosis; <i>P</i> &lt; .001). TMB (in mutations/Mb) was significantly higher among smokers vs nonsmokers (8.7 [IQR, 4.4-14.8] vs 2.6 [IQR, 1.7-5.2]; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) and significantly lower among patients with vs without an alteration in <i>EGFR</i> (3.5 [IQR, 1.76-6.1] vs 7.8 [IQR, 3.5-13.9]; <i>P</i> &lt; .001), <i>ALK</i> (2.1 [IQR, 0.9-4.0] vs 7.0 [IQR, 3.5-13.0]; <i>P</i> &lt; .001), <i>RET</i> (4.6 [IQR, 1.7-8.7] vs 7.0 [IQR, 2.6-13.0]; <i>P</i> = .004), or <i>ROS1</i> (4.0 [IQR, 1.2-9.6] vs 7.0 [IQR, 2.6-13.0]; <i>P</i> = .03). In patients treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies (n = 1290, 31.7%), TMB of 20 or more was significantly associated with improved OS from therapy initiation (16.8 months [95% CI, 11.6-24.9] vs 8.5 months [95% CI, 7.6-9.7]; <i>P</i> &lt; .001), longer time receiving therapy (7.8 months [95% CI, 5.5-11.1] vs 3.3 months [95% CI, 2.8-3.7]; <i>P</i> &lt; .001), and increased clinical benefit rate (80.7% vs 56.7%; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) vs TMB less than 20. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi190029-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1224779e649">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d1224779e651">Among patients with NSCLC included in a longitudinal database of clinical data linked to CGP results from routine care, exploratory analyses replicated previously described associations between clinical and genomic characteristics, between driver mutations and response to targeted therapy, and between TMB and response to immunotherapy. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of creating a clinicogenomic database derived from routine clinical experience and provide support for further research and discovery evaluating this approach in oncology. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d1224779e654">This cancer epidemiology study links electronic health record (EHR) data with comprehensive genomic profiling to identify patient characteristics and gene alterations associated with overall survival, response to targeted and immune therapies, and other clinical outcomes in patients non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Next-generation sequencing reveals high concordance of recurrent somatic alterations between primary tumor and metastases from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

          Characterization of the genomic changes that drive an individual patient's disease is critical in management of many cancers. In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), obtaining tumor samples of sufficient size for genomic profiling on recurrence is often challenging. We undertook this study to compare genomic alterations identified in archived primary tumors from patients with NSCLC with those identified in metachronous or synchronous metastases. Primary and matched metastatic tumor pairs from 15 patients were analyzed by using a targeted next-generation sequencing assay in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments laboratory. Genomic libraries were captured for 3,230 exons in 182 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 14 genes often rearranged in cancer and sequenced to high coverage. Among 30 tumors, 311 genomic alterations were identified of which 63 were known recurrent (32 in primary tumor, 31 in metastasis) and 248 were nonrecurrent (likely passenger). TP53 mutations were the most frequently observed recurrent alterations (12 patients). Tumors harbored two or more (maximum four) recurrent alterations in 10 patients. Comparative analysis of recurrent alterations between primary tumor and matched metastasis revealed a concordance rate of 94% compared with 63% for likely passenger alterations. This high concordance suggests that for the purposes of genomic profiling, use of archived primary tumor can identify the key recurrent somatic alterations present in matched NSCLC metastases and may provide much of the relevant genomic information required to guide treatment on recurrence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Real-World Evidence In Support Of Precision Medicine: Clinico-Genomic Cancer Data As A Case Study

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Impact of KRAS codon subtypes from a randomised phase II trial of selumetinib plus docetaxel in KRAS mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

              Background: Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886)+docetaxel increases median overall survival (OS) and significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with docetaxel alone in patients with KRAS mutant, stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT00890825). Methods: Retrospective analysis of OS, PFS, ORR and change in tumour size at week 6 for different sub-populations of KRAS codon mutations. Results: In patients receiving selumetinib+docetaxel and harbouring KRAS G12C or G12V mutations there were trends towards greater improvement in OS, PFS and ORR compared with other KRAS mutations. Conclusion: Different KRAS mutations in NSCLC may influence selumetinib/docetaxel sensitivity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                April 09 2019
                April 09 2019
                : 321
                : 14
                : 1391
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
                [2 ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
                [4 ]Flatiron Health Inc, New York, New York
                [5 ]Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
                [6 ]Voyager Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
                [7 ]New York University School of Medicine, New York
                [8 ]Now with the Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2019.3241
                6459115
                30964529
                3fd82ab6-199e-4d33-a643-3eecea69e5d2
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article