11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Systematic Review of Metacognitive Beliefs in Chronic Medical Conditions

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Psychological functioning plays an important role in medical conditions and impacts patients' quality of life. Previously, many studies have highlighted the association of metacognition to both the development and maintenance of emotional disorders. Recently, several researchers pointed out the relevant role of dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs in the context of chronic diseases. Hence, dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs could be directly related to anxiety and depression, regardless of the medical condition's expression. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence regarding the association of metacognition with anxiety, depression, and perceived quality of life, in the context of medical conditions, according to Wells' theory.

          Methods: A systematic review based on electronic bibliographic databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Web of Knowledge) of scientific literature was carried out. Studies involving patients evaluated in clinical settings were included in the analysis.

          Results: Our findings indicated that metacognition appears to be related to anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with medical chronic conditions. Therefore, dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs might be a relevant factor associated with the process of adapting to illness.

          Conclusions: The additional evaluation of metacognitive factors in the context of several medical chronic conditions appears valuable. Due to the rising interest in the study of metacognition, suggestions for future research have also been provided.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Beliefs about Worry and Intrusions: The Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire and its Correlates

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

              Background: Metacognitive therapy (MCT) continues to gain increased ground as a treatment for psychological complaints. During the last years, several clinical trials on the efficacy of MCT have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an updated meta-analytic review of the effect of MCT for psychological complaints. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of trials on MCT for young and adult patients with psychological complaints published until January 2018, using PsycINFO, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Trials with a minimum of 10 participants in the MCT condition were included. Results: A total of 25 studies that examined a variety of psychological complaints met our inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomized controlled trials. We identified only one trial that was conducted with children and adolescents. In trials with adult patients, large uncontrolled effect size estimates from pre- to post-treatment and follow-up suggest that MCT is effective at reducing symptoms of the targeted primary complaints, anxiety, depression, and dysfunctional metacognitions. The comparison with waitlist control conditions also resulted in a large effect (Hedges' g = 2.06). The comparison of MCT to cognitive and behavioral interventions at post-treatment and at follow-up showed pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) of 0.69 and 0.37 at post-treatment (k = 8) and follow-up (k = 7), respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that MCT is an effective treatment for a range of psychological complaints. To date, strongest evidence exists for anxiety and depression. Current results suggest that MCT may be superior to other psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioral interventions. However, more trials with larger number of participants are needed in order to draw firm conclusions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                10 January 2020
                2019
                : 10
                : 2875
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Human, Social and Health Sciences, University of Cassino and South Latium , Cassino, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina , Messina, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Roumen Kirov, Institute of Neurobiology (BAS), Bulgaria

                Reviewed by: Valentina Nicolardi, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Stian Solem, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

                *Correspondence: Vittorio Lenzo vittorio.lenzo@ 123456unicas.it

                This article was submitted to Psychopathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02875
                6965316
                31998178
                3fe2b786-b6d7-48e0-9c7b-e0984829059c
                Copyright © 2020 Lenzo, Sardella, Martino and Quattropani.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 October 2019
                : 04 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 77, Pages: 13, Words: 9538
                Categories
                Psychology
                Systematic Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                metacognition,mcq-30,cognitive attentional syndrome (cas),metacognitive beliefs,chronic medical conditions,anxiety,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article