5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mixed Models as a Tool for Comparing Groups of Time Series in Plant Sciences

      other

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plants adapt to continual changes in environmental conditions throughout their life spans. High-throughput phenotyping methods have been developed to noninvasively monitor the physiological responses to abiotic/biotic stresses on a scale spanning a long time, covering most of the vegetative and reproductive stages. However, some of the physiological events comprise almost immediate and very fast responses towards the changing environment which might be overlooked in long-term observations. Additionally, there are certain technical difficulties and restrictions in analyzing phenotyping data, especially when dealing with repeated measurements. In this study, a method for comparing means at different time points using generalized linear mixed models combined with classical time series models is presented. As an example, we use multiple chlorophyll time series measurements from different genotypes. The use of additional time series models as random effects is essential as the residuals of the initial mixed model may contain autocorrelations that bias the result. The nature of mixed models offers a viable solution as these can incorporate time series models for residuals as random effects. The results from analyzing chlorophyll content time series show that the autocorrelation is successfully eliminated from the residuals and incorporated into the final model. This allows the use of statistical inference.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Automatic Time Series Forecasting: TheforecastPackage forR

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test?

              Multiple comparisons tests (MCTs) are performed several times on the mean of experimental conditions. When the null hypothesis is rejected in a validation, MCTs are performed when certain experimental conditions have a statistically significant mean difference or there is a specific aspect between the group means. A problem occurs if the error rate increases while multiple hypothesis tests are performed simultaneously. Consequently, in an MCT, it is necessary to control the error rate to an appropriate level. In this paper, we discuss how to test multiple hypotheses simultaneously while limiting type I error rate, which is caused by α inflation. To choose the appropriate test, we must maintain the balance between statistical power and type I error rate. If the test is too conservative, a type I error is not likely to occur. However, concurrently, the test may have insufficient power resulted in increased probability of type II error occurrence. Most researchers may hope to find the best way of adjusting the type I error rate to discriminate the real differences between observed data without wasting too much statistical power. It is expected that this paper will help researchers understand the differences between MCTs and apply them appropriately.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Plants (Basel)
                Plants (Basel)
                plants
                Plants
                MDPI
                2223-7747
                13 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 10
                : 2
                : 362
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Plant Sciences Core Facility, CEITEC—Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
                [2 ]Functional Genomics & Proteomics of Plants, CEITEC—Central European Institute of Technology and National Centre for Biotechnology Research, Faculty of Science, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; jan.skalak@ 123456ceitec.muni.cz (J.S.); veronika.balakhonova@ 123456ceitec.muni.cz (V.B.); hejatko@ 123456sci.muni.cz (J.H.)
                [3 ]Photon Systems Instruments, (PSI, spol. sr.o.), 66424 Drásov, Czech Republic; benedikty@ 123456psi.cz
                [4 ]Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, 67100 Xanthi, Greece; rigas@ 123456ee.duth.gr
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6680-3656
                Article
                plants-10-00362
                10.3390/plants10020362
                7918370
                33668650
                3ff517a6-3ecc-4d11-84cc-f17ee563135c
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 December 2020
                : 10 February 2021
                Categories
                Technical Note

                arabidopsis,linear mixed models,time series analysis,arima

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log