26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

      review-article
      Living Reviews in Relativity
      Springer International Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The status of experimental tests of general relativity and of theoretical frameworks for analysing them are reviewed. Einstein’s equivalence principle (EEP) is well supported by experiments such as the Eötvös experiment, tests of special relativity, and the gravitational redshift experiment. Future tests of EEP and of the inverse square law will search for new interactions arising from unification or quantum gravity. Tests of general relativity at the post-Newtonian level have reached high precision, including the light defl ection the Shapiro time delay, the perihelion advance of Mercury, and the Nordtvedt effect in lunar motion. Gravitational wave damping has been detected in an amount that agrees with general relativity to half a percent using the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar, and new binary pulsar systems may yield further improvements. When direct observation of gravitational radiation from astrophysical sources begins, new tests of general relativity will be possible.

          Related collections

          Most cited references136

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Tensor-scalar cosmological models and their relaxation toward general relativity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            General relativity as a cosmological attractor of tensor-scalar theories.

            (1993)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lunar laser ranging: a continuing legacy of the apollo program.

              On 21 July 1969, during the first manned lunar mission, Apollo 11, the first retroreflector array was placed on the moon, enabling highly accurate measurements of the Earthmoon separation by means of laser ranging. Lunar laser ranging (LLR) turns the Earthmoon system into a laboratory for a broad range of investigations, including astronomy, lunar science, gravitational physics, geodesy, and geodynamics. Contributions from LLR include the three-orders-of-magnitude improvement in accuracy in the lunar ephemeris, a several-orders-of-magnitude improvement in the measurement of the variations in the moon's rotation, and the verification of the principle of equivalence for massive bodies with unprecedented accuracy. Lunar laser ranging analysis has provided measurements of the Earth's precession, the moon's tidal acceleration, and lunar rotational dissipation. These scientific results, current technological developments, and prospects for the future are discussed here.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                http://wugrav.wustl.edu/People/CLIFF/index.html
                Journal
                Living Rev Relativ
                Living Rev Relativ
                Living Reviews in Relativity
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1433-8351
                11 May 2001
                11 May 2001
                2001
                : 4
                : 1
                : 4
                Affiliations
                McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Department of Physics, Washington University, 63130 St. Louis, MO USA
                Article
                4
                10.12942/lrr-2001-4
                5253802
                40082952-3b41-4b69-9229-d86171fd4a95
                © The Author(s) 2001
                History
                Categories
                Review Paper
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2001

                Comments

                Comment on this article