37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using radiomics for diagnostic and predictive purposes in patients with intracranial meningioma. To perform a meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the prediction of intracranial meningioma grading from pre-operative brain MRI.

          Methods

          Articles published from the year 2000 on radiomics and machine learning applications in brain imaging of meningioma patients were included. Their methodological quality was assessed by three readers with the radiomics quality score, using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter-reader reproducibility. A meta-analysis of machine learning studies for the preoperative evaluation of meningioma grading was performed and their risk of bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.

          Results

          In all, 23 studies were included in the systematic review, 8 of which were suitable for the meta-analysis. Total (possible range, −8 to 36) and percentage radiomics quality scores were respectively 6.96 ± 4.86 and 19 ± 13% with a moderate to good inter-reader reproducibility (ICC = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals, 95%CI = 0.54–0.88). The meta-analysis showed an overall AUC of 0.88 (95%CI = 0.84–0.93) with a standard error of 0.02.

          Conclusions

          Machine learning and radiomics have been proposed for multiple applications in the imaging of meningiomas, with promising results for preoperative lesion grading. However, future studies with adequate standardization and higher methodological quality are required prior to their introduction in clinical practice.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

              Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                renato.cuocolo@unina.it
                Journal
                Neuroradiology
                Neuroradiology
                Neuroradiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0028-3940
                1432-1920
                2 March 2021
                2 March 2021
                2021
                : 63
                : 8
                : 1293-1304
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4691.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 385X, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, , University of Naples “Federico II”, ; Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.4691.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 385X, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, , University of Naples “Federico II”, ; Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-4612
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-7637
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-1574
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-5789
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1603-6396
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7057-3494
                Article
                2668
                10.1007/s00234-021-02668-0
                8295153
                33649882
                401426b0-cbd6-45bd-b6b8-5d298de054c0
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 December 2020
                : 3 February 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
                Categories
                Functional Neuroradiology
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Radiology & Imaging
                systematic review,meta-analysis,machine learning,meningioma,magnetic resonance imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article