28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The ups and downs of temporal orienting: a review of auditory temporal orienting studies and a model associating the heterogeneous findings on the auditory N1 with opposite effects of attention and prediction

      research-article
      Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      temporal orienting, attention, predictability, audition, ERP, N1

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The temporal orienting of attention refers to the process of focusing (neural) resources on a particular time point in order to boost the processing of and the responding to sensory events. Temporal attention is manipulated by varying the task-relevance of events at different time points or by inducing expectations that an event occurs at a particular time point. Notably, the electrophysiological correlates of these manipulations at early processing stages are not identical: Auditory studies operationalizing temporal attention through task-relevance consistently found enhancements of early, sensory processing, as shown in the N1 component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). By contrast, previous work on temporal orienting based on expectations showed mixed results: early, sensory processing was either enhanced or attenuated or not affected at all. In the present work, I will review existing findings on temporal orienting with a special focus on the auditory modality and present a working model to reconcile the previously heterogeneous results. Specifically, I will suggest that when expectations are used to manipulate attention, this will lead both to an orienting of attention and to the generation of precise predictions about the upcoming event. Attention and prediction are assumed to have opposite effects on early auditory processing, with temporal attention increasing and temporal predictions decreasing the associated ERP correlate, the auditory N1. The heterogeneous findings of studies manipulating temporal orienting by inducing expectations may thus be the consequence of differences in the relative contribution of attention and prediction processes. The model's predictions will be discussed in the context of a functional interpretation of the auditory N1 as an attention call signal, as presented in a recent model on auditory processing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Das Reafferenzprinzip: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

              Auditory evoked potentials were recorded from the vertex of subjects who listened selectively to a series of tone pips in one ear and ignored concurrent tone pips in the other ear. The negative component of the evoked potential peaking at 80 to 110 milliseconds was substantially larger for the attended tones. This negative component indexed a stimulus set mode of selective attention toward the tone pips in one ear. A late positive component peaking at 250 to 400 milliseconds reflected the response set established to recognize infrequent, higher pitched tone pips in the attended series.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                11 June 2013
                2013
                : 7
                : 263
                Affiliations
                Institut für Experimentelle Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Simone Vossel, University College London, UK

                Reviewed by: Floris P. De Lange, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands; Stefan Berti, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany

                *Correspondence: Kathrin Lange, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger Allee 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany e-mail: kathrin.lange@ 123456bfarm.de
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2013.00263
                3678089
                23781186
                4018eb45-1f2b-4fd8-9715-4ca07ccccc28
                Copyright © 2013 Lange.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 28 January 2013
                : 23 May 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 4, References: 103, Pages: 14, Words: 11677
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Hypothesis and Theory Article

                Neurosciences
                temporal orienting,attention,predictability,audition,erp,n1
                Neurosciences
                temporal orienting, attention, predictability, audition, erp, n1

                Comments

                Comment on this article