5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MR and diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating atypical bone metastasis from benign bone lesion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          To investigate the feasibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion MR and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in discriminating atypical bone metastasis from benign bone lesion in patients with tumors.

          Methods:

          Patients with bone lesions in lower extremity suspected of metastases were enrolled in this prospective study. IVIM diffusion MR and DKI were performed before biopsy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion (D), perfusion fraction (f) and perfusion-related pseudodiffusion (D*) were generated with IVIM, while mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusion (MD) generated with DKI. Two radiologists blinded to pathology results separately measured these parameters for each lesion through drawing region of interest. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine the inter-reader viability in measurement. The patients with pathology-confirmed metastasis or benign lesion were analyzed. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare IVIM and DKI parameters between metastasis group and benign lesion group. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of discrimination.

          Results:

          Bone lesions from 28 patients (metastasis, n = 15; benign lesion, n = 13; mean age = 55 years; age range, 34~77) were analyzed with IVIM and DKI. Intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.8 for all parameters. ADC, D and MD were significantly lower in metastases versus benign lesions ( p <0.05). MK and f value were significantly higher in metastases versus benign lesions ( p<0.05). D* was not significantly different between the two groups ( p>0.05). Areas under curve for ADC, D, f, MK and MD were 0.935, 0.939, 0.891, 0.840 and 0.844 respectively.

          Conclusions:

          IVIM and DKI derived parameters distinguish between atypical bone metastasis and benign bone lesion in selected patients with tumors.

          Advances in knowledge:

          Bone metastasis and benign bone lesion differ in water molecular diffusion.

          Intravoxel incoherent motion derived true diffusion distinguishes between atypical bone metastasis and benign lesion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Application of the diffusion kurtosis model for the study of breast lesions.

          To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the differentiation and characterisation of breast lesions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience.

            To obtain intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters with biexponential analysis of multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare these parameters to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained with monoexponential modeling in their ability to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions. Twenty-eight patients were imaged at 1.5 T utilizing contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and breath-hold DWI using 8 b values (range: 0-800 s/mm(2)). Perfusion fraction (f(p)), tissue diffusivity (D(t)), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D(p)) were calculated using segmented biexponential analysis. ADC(total) and ADC(0-400-800) were calculated with monoexponential fitting of the DWI data. f(p), D(t), D(p), ADC(total), and ADC(0-400-800) were compared between enhancing and nonenhancing renal lesions. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for all DWI parameters. f(p) was correlated with percent enhancement. There were a total of 31 renal lesions (15 enhancing and 16 nonenhancing) in 28 patients on CE-MRI. f(p) of enhancing masses was significantly higher (27.9 vs. 6.1) and D(t) was significantly lower (1.47 vs. 2.40 ×10(-3) mm(2)/s). IVIM parameters f(p) and D(t) demonstrated higher accuracy in differentiating enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions compared with monoexponential parameters ADC(0-400-800) and ADC(total), with area under the curve of 0.946, 0.896, 0.854, and 0.675, respectively. There was a good correlation between f(p) and percent enhancement (r = 0.7; P < 0.001). IVIM parameters f(p) and D(t) obtained with biexponential fitting of multi-b value DWI have higher accuracy compared with ADC (obtained with monoexponential fit) in discriminating enhancing from nonenhancing renal lesions. Furthermore, f(p) demonstrates good correlation with percent enhancement and can provide information regarding lesion vascularity without the use of exogenous contrast agent.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

              To investigate the correlation between perfusion-related parameters obtained with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and classical perfusion parameters obtained with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and to compare direct and asymptotic fitting, the pixel-by-pixel approach, and a region of interest (ROI)-based approach respectively for IVIM parameter calculation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Br J Radiol
                Br J Radiol
                bjr
                The British Journal of Radiology
                The British Institute of Radiology.
                0007-1285
                1748-880X
                August 2019
                06 June 2019
                06 June 2019
                : 92
                : 1100
                : 20190119
                Affiliations
                [1 ]org-divisionDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Xiaoming Li. E-mail: tongjilili1984@ 123456qq.com
                Article
                BJR-D-19-00119
                10.1259/bjr.20190119
                6724638
                31204855
                401cadf0-8497-4e09-ab93-b7b4a25df5ac
                © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 31 January 2019
                : 25 May 2019
                : 28 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 16, Pages: 0, Words: 3762
                Categories
                Full Paper
                bjr, BJR

                Radiology & Imaging
                Radiology & Imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article