10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome.

      European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
      Aged, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, instrumentation, methods, mortality, Coronary Artery Bypass, Coronary Disease, pathology, surgery, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart-Lung Machine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine whether patients with critical left main stem (LMS) coronary artery disease can undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery safely and successfully. From May 1996 to March 2000 data for patients with critical (> or =50%) LMS stenosis who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CCAB) or without (OPCAB) were collected prospectively using the Patient Analysis & Tracking System. A reusable pressure stabilizer, intra-coronary shunts and a single posterior pericardial stitch exposure technique were used in all OPCAB cases. Non-randomized, retrospective data analysis included demographic and preoperative risk factors, operative details, clinical outcome and early follow-up. During the study period 387 patients with LMS stenosis underwent surgery (OPCAB n=75, CCAB n=312). Groups were similar in terms of preoperative and intraoperative variables although CCAB patients received significantly more grafts per patient (3.1+/-0.73 vs. 2.6+/-0.76, P< or =0.001). Mortality was similar in both groups (OPCAB 1.3% vs. CCAB 2.6%). OPCAB patients when compared to CCAB patients had a lower requirement for postoperative inotropes (12.0% vs. 38.1%, P=0.0001), temporary postoperative pacing (2.7% vs. 10.1%, P=0.02), and blood product transfusion (6.7% vs. 31.4%, P<0.0001), a lower incidence of postoperative chest infection (0% vs. 6.7%, P=0.02) and a slightly reduced postoperative length of stay (7.9+/-5.46 vs. 8.3+/-5.11 days, P=0.01). At 24 months follow-up, CCAB and OPCAB actuarial survival was 94.1+/-1.7% and 97.7+/-2.3%, respectively. OPCAB surgery is safe and effective in patients with critical LMS disease.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article