13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety Performance of Healthcare Professionals: Validation and Use of the Adapted Workplace Health and Safety Instrument

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Improving patient safety and reducing occupational accidents are two of the main challenges in healthcare. Instruments to measure safety performance and occupational safety are rare. This study aimed to prepare and validate a German version of the adapted workplace health and safety instrument to assess the safety performance of healthcare professionals. Overall, 168 healthcare professionals participated in this explorative cross-sectional study. The instrument consists of 16 items related to safety performance in four dimensions. We calculated mean values and standard deviations for each individual item and those of the four dimensions of the instrument. We evaluated internal consistency and construct validity, explored the dimensionality of the instrument through exploratory factor analysis, and tested how our data fit with the original model with confirmatory factor analysis. Among the participants, 73.8% were nurses and nurses in training, with the majority of the sample being female (71.9%) and younger than 30 (52.5%). Cronbach’s alpha for all four dimensions was >0.7. All items were loaded on factors according to the original theoretical model. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit (normed χ²/df = 1.43 (≤2.5), root mean square error of approximation = 0.06 (≤0.07), goodness of fit index = 0.90 (>0.90), comparative fit index = 0.95 (≥0.90), and Tucker–Lewis index = 0.93 (>0.90). The German version of the instrument demonstrated acceptable properties and was a good fit to the original theoretical model, allowing measurement of healthcare professionals’ safety knowledge, motivation, compliance, and participation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation.

            Research in the areas of organizational climate and work performance was used to develop a framework for measuring perceptions of safety at work. The framework distinguished perceptions of the work environment from perceptions of performance related to safety. Two studies supported application of the framework to employee perceptions of safety in the workplace. Safety compliance and safety participation were distinguished as separate components of safety-related performance. Perceptions of knowledge about safety and motivation to perform safely influenced individual reports of safety performance and also mediated the link between safety climate and safety performance. Specific dimensions of safety climate were identified and constituted a higher order safety climate factor. The results support conceptualizing safety climate as an antecedent to safety performance in organizations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors.

              Recent conceptual and methodological advances in behavioral safety research afford an opportunity to integrate past and recent research findings. Building on theoretical models of worker performance and work climate, this study quantitatively integrates the safety literature by meta-analytically examining person- and situation-based antecedents of safety performance behaviors and safety outcomes (i.e., accidents and injuries). As anticipated, safety knowledge and safety motivation were most strongly related to safety performance behaviors, closely followed by psychological safety climate and group safety climate. With regard to accidents and injuries, however, group safety climate had the strongest association. In addition, tests of a meta-analytic path model provided support for the theoretical model that guided this overall investigation. The implications of these findings for advancing the study and management of workplace safety are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                23 July 2021
                August 2021
                : 18
                : 15
                : 7816
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Patient Safety (IfPS), University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; judith.hammerschmidt@ 123456ukbonn.de (J.H.); do.riouchi@ 123456gmail.com (D.R.); matthias.weigl@ 123456ukbonn.de (M.W.); franziska.geiser@ 123456ukbonn.de (F.G.); nicole.ernstmann@ 123456ukbonn.de (N.E.)
                [2 ]Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
                [3 ]School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4027, Australia; a.neal@ 123456psy.uq.edu.au
                [4 ]Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; Andrea.Icks@ 123456uni-duesseldorf.de
                [5 ]Department of Oncology, Hematology, Immuno-Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; peter.brossart@ 123456ukbonn.de
                [6 ]Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
                Author notes
                [†]

                L.H. and N.G. contributed equally to this paper.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-3655
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-0963
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-2121
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-1725
                Article
                ijerph-18-07816
                10.3390/ijerph18157816
                8345542
                34360109
                40916c6c-bf35-47ec-b474-716c2bb0edca
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 June 2021
                : 20 July 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                patient safety,occupational safety,safety performance,healthcare professionals,acute care

                Comments

                Comment on this article