20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Retrotransposon activation contributes to neurodegeneration in a Drosophila TDP-43 model of ALS

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are two incurable neurodegenerative disorders that exist on a symptomological spectrum and share both genetic underpinnings and pathophysiological hallmarks. Functional abnormality of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), an aggregation-prone RNA and DNA binding protein, is observed in the vast majority of both familial and sporadic ALS cases and in ~40% of FTLD cases, but the cascade of events leading to cell death are not understood. We have expressed human TDP-43 (hTDP-43) in Drosophila neurons and glia, a model that recapitulates many of the characteristics of TDP-43-linked human disease including protein aggregation pathology, locomotor impairment, and premature death. We report that such expression of hTDP-43 impairs small interfering RNA (siRNA) silencing, which is the major post-transcriptional mechanism of retrotransposable element (RTE) control in somatic tissue. This is accompanied by de-repression of a panel of both LINE and LTR families of RTEs, with somewhat different elements being active in response to hTDP-43 expression in glia versus neurons. hTDP-43 expression in glia causes an early and severe loss of control of a specific RTE, the endogenous retrovirus (ERV) gypsy. We demonstrate that gypsy causes the degenerative phenotypes in these flies because we are able to rescue the toxicity of glial hTDP-43 either by genetically blocking expression of this RTE or by pharmacologically inhibiting RTE reverse transcriptase activity. Moreover, we provide evidence that activation of DNA damage-mediated programmed cell death underlies both neuronal and glial hTDP-43 toxicity, consistent with RTE-mediated effects in both cell types. Our findings suggest a novel mechanism in which RTE activity contributes to neurodegeneration in TDP-43-mediated diseases such as ALS and FTLD.

          Author summary

          Functional abnormality of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), an aggregation-prone RNA and DNA binding protein, is observed in the vast majority of both familial and sporadic ALS cases and in ~40% of FTLD cases, and mutations in TDP-43 are causal in a subset of familial ALS cases. Although cytoplasmic inclusions of this mostly nuclear protein are a hallmark of the disease, the cascade of events leading to cell death are not understood. We demonstrate that expression of human TDP-43 (hTDP-43) in Drosophila neurons or glial cells, which results in toxic cytoplasmic accumulation of TDP-43, causes broad expression of retrotransposons. In the case of glial hTDP-43 expression, the endogenous retrovirus (ERV) gypsy causally contributes to degeneration because inhibiting gypsy genetically or pharmacologically is sufficient to rescue the phenotypic effects. Moreover, we demonstrate that activation of DNA damage-mediated programmed cell death underlies hTDP-43 and gypsy mediated toxicity. Finally, we find that hTDP-43 pathology impairs small interfering RNA silencing, which is an essential system that normally protects the genome from RTEs. These findings suggest a novel mechanism in which a storm of retrotransposon activation drives neurodegeneration in TDP-43 mediated diseases such as ALS and FTLD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe.

          Since the discovery in 1993 of the first small silencing RNA, a dizzying number of small RNA classes have been identified, including microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). These classes differ in their biogenesis, their modes of target regulation and in the biological pathways they regulate. There is a growing realization that, despite their differences, these distinct small RNA pathways are interconnected, and that small RNA pathways compete and collaborate as they regulate genes and protect the genome from external and internal threats.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A distinct small RNA pathway silences selfish genetic elements in the germline.

            In the Drosophila germline, repeat-associated small interfering RNAs (rasiRNAs) ensure genomic stability by silencing endogenous selfish genetic elements such as retrotransposons and repetitive sequences. Whereas small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) derive from both the sense and antisense strands of their double-stranded RNA precursors, rasiRNAs arise mainly from the antisense strand. rasiRNA production appears not to require Dicer-1, which makes microRNAs (miRNAs), or Dicer-2, which makes siRNAs, and rasiRNAs lack the 2',3' hydroxy termini characteristic of animal siRNA and miRNA. Unlike siRNAs and miRNAs, rasiRNAs function through the Piwi, rather than the Ago, Argonaute protein subfamily. Our data suggest that rasiRNAs protect the fly germline through a silencing mechanism distinct from both the miRNA and RNA interference pathways.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Distinct roles for Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 in the siRNA/miRNA silencing pathways.

              The RNase III enzyme Dicer processes RNA into siRNAs and miRNAs, which direct a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to cleave mRNA or block its translation (RNAi). We have characterized mutations in the Drosophila dicer-1 and dicer-2 genes. Mutation in dicer-1 blocks processing of miRNA precursors, whereas dicer-2 mutants are defective for processing siRNA precursors. It has been recently found that Drosophila Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 are also components of siRNA-dependent RISC (siRISC). We find that Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 are required for siRNA-directed mRNA cleavage, though the RNase III activity of Dicer-2 is not required. Dicer-1 and Dicer-2 facilitate distinct steps in the assembly of siRISC. However, Dicer-1 but not Dicer-2 is essential for miRISC-directed translation repression. Thus, siRISCs and miRISCs are different with respect to Dicers in Drosophila.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                16 March 2017
                March 2017
                : 13
                : 3
                : e1006635
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States of America
                [2 ]Watson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Farmingdale State College, Farmingdale, NY United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
                [5 ]Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
                University of Utah School of Medicine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: This work was supported by funding from Dart Neuroscience LLC in the form of an external research program grant to JD. DART LC has filed patent applications based on some of the findings described. JD has not received any personal financial compensation from DART LLC. The funding from DART LLC has had no influence on the design of experiments or the collection and reporting of data.

                • Conceptualization: LK JD.

                • Data curation: WWL MH.

                • Formal analysis: WWL MH NR.

                • Funding acquisition: JD MH.

                • Investigation: LK NC RBM SH KM LP NR DT.

                • Methodology: RBM WWL NR MH LK.

                • Project administration: JD.

                • Resources: MH.

                • Supervision: JD.

                • Validation: LK NC KM LP.

                • Visualization: LK NC RBM SH WWL KM.

                • Writing – original draft: LK JD.

                • Writing – review & editing: LK KM MH JD.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-9416
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5821-7630
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-213X
                Article
                PGENETICS-D-16-01854
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1006635
                5354250
                28301478
                40c8901a-898c-45de-9c47-68930a0ed2bd
                © 2017 Krug et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 August 2016
                : 14 February 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Pages: 34
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: NS067690
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: NS091748
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: DART Neuroscience LLC
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ride For Life
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Ride For Life
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001447, Rita Allen Foundation;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: T32GM065094
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by NIH R01 grant NS067690 and NIH R01 grant NS091748 awarded to JD, and by external research awards to JD from DART Neuroscience LLC. We also are grateful for generous support to JD and MH from Ride For Life, Inc. The Rita Allen foundation provided support to MH. In addition, LK was supported by NIH training grant 5T32GM065094. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                Gene regulation
                Small interfering RNAs
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                RNA
                Non-coding RNA
                Small interfering RNAs
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Model Organisms
                Drosophila Melanogaster
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Model Organisms
                Drosophila Melanogaster
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Animal Models
                Drosophila Melanogaster
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Arthropoda
                Insects
                Drosophila
                Drosophila Melanogaster
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Toxicology
                Toxicity
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Toxicology
                Toxicity
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                DNA
                DNA damage
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                DNA
                DNA damage
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cell Processes
                Cell Death
                Apoptosis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cell Processes
                Cell Death
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Animal Genomics
                Invertebrate Genomics
                Custom metadata
                Most of the data are provide as figures in this manuscript. The exception is the raw data from the RNA sequencing. All RNAseq data are available from the Geo database (accession number GSE85398).

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article