97
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      In Vivo T-Box Transcription Factor Profiling Reveals Joint Regulation of Embryonic Neuromesodermal Bipotency

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          The design of effective cell replacement therapies requires detailed knowledge of how embryonic stem cells form primary tissues, such as mesoderm or neurectoderm that later become skeletal muscle or nervous system. Members of the T-box transcription factor family are key in the formation of these primary tissues, but their underlying molecular activities are poorly understood. Here, we define in vivo genome-wide regulatory inputs of the T-box proteins Brachyury, Eomesodermin, and VegT, which together maintain neuromesodermal stem cells and determine their bipotential fates in frog embryos. These T-box proteins are all recruited to the same genomic recognition sites, from where they activate genes involved in stem cell maintenance and mesoderm formation while repressing neurogenic genes. Consequently, their loss causes embryos to form an oversized neural tube with no mesodermal derivatives. This collaboration between T-box family members thus ensures the continuous formation of correctly proportioned neural and mesodermal tissues in vertebrate embryos during axial elongation.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • The T-box factors Eomes, VegT, and Xbra largely bind the same DNA binding sites

          • They control stem cell differentiation into neural or mesodermal tissue in vivo

          • Joint loss of T-box factors entirely prevents mesoderm formation in vertebrate embryos

          • Promoter-proximal T-box factors recruit RNA Pol II for transcriptional activation

          Abstract

          The development of effective cell replacement therapies requires detailed knowledge of how embryonic stem cells form primary tissues, such as mesoderm or neurectoderm that later become skeletal muscle or spinal cord. Gentsch, Smith, and colleagues now provide mechanistic insight into how T-box transcription factors regulate stem cells to form neural or mesodermal tissues. The authors show how this ensures the harmonious formation of spinal cord, muscle, and notochord as the vertebrate embryo elongates along its anteroposterior axis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints

          Regulatory factor binding to genomic DNA protects the underlying sequence from cleavage by DNaseI, leaving nucleotide-resolution footprints. Using genomic DNaseI footprinting across 41 diverse cell and tissue types, we detected 45 million factor occupancy events within regulatory regions, representing differential binding to 8.4 million distinct short sequence elements. Here we show that this small genomic sequence compartment, roughly twice the size of the exome, encodes an expansive repertoire of conserved recognition sequences for DNA-binding proteins that nearly doubles the size of the human cis-regulatory lexicon. We find that genetic variants affecting allelic chromatin states are concentrated in footprints, and that these elements are preferentially sheltered from DNA methylation. High-resolution DNaseI cleavage patterns mirror nucleotide-level evolutionary conservation and track the crystallographic topography of protein-DNA interfaces, indicating that transcription factor structure has been evolutionarily imprinted on the human genome sequence. We identify a stereotyped 50 base-pair footprint that precisely defines the site of transcript origination within thousands of human promoters. Finally, we describe a large collection of novel regulatory factor recognition motifs that are highly conserved in both sequence and function, and exhibit cell-selective occupancy patterns that closely parallel major regulators of development, differentiation, and pluripotency.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            PANTHER version 7: improved phylogenetic trees, orthologs and collaboration with the Gene Ontology Consortium

            Protein Analysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) is a comprehensive software system for inferring the functions of genes based on their evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic trees of gene families form the basis for PANTHER and these trees are annotated with ontology terms describing the evolution of gene function from ancestral to modern day genes. One of the main applications of PANTHER is in accurate prediction of the functions of uncharacterized genes, based on their evolutionary relationships to genes with functions known from experiment. The PANTHER website, freely available at http://www.pantherdb.org, also includes software tools for analyzing genomic data relative to known and inferred gene functions. Since 2007, there have been several new developments to PANTHER: (i) improved phylogenetic trees, explicitly representing speciation and gene duplication events, (ii) identification of gene orthologs, including least diverged orthologs (best one-to-one pairs), (iii) coverage of more genomes (48 genomes, up to 87% of genes in each genome; see http://www.pantherdb.org/panther/summaryStats.jsp), (iv) improved support for alternative database identifiers for genes, proteins and microarray probes and (v) adoption of the SBGN standard for display of biological pathways. In addition, PANTHER trees are being annotated with gene function as part of the Gene Ontology Reference Genome project, resulting in an increasing number of curated functional annotations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Master transcription factors determine cell-type-specific responses to TGF-β signaling.

              Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling, mediated through the transcription factors Smad2 and Smad3 (Smad2/3), directs different responses in different cell types. Here we report that Smad3 co-occupies the genome with cell-type-specific master transcription factors. Thus, Smad3 occupies the genome with Oct4 in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), Myod1 in myotubes, and PU.1 in pro-B cells. We find that these master transcription factors are required for Smad3 occupancy and that TGF-β signaling largely affects the genes bound by the master transcription factors. Furthermore, we show that induction of Myod1 in nonmuscle cells is sufficient to redirect Smad3 to Myod1 sites. We conclude that cell-type-specific master transcription factors determine the genes bound by Smad2/3 and are thus responsible for orchestrating the cell-type-specific effects of TGF-β signaling. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell Rep
                Cell Rep
                Cell Reports
                Cell Press
                2211-1247
                26 September 2013
                26 September 2013
                : 4
                : 6
                : 1185-1196
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Systems Biology, National Institute for Medical Research, London NW7 1AA, UK
                [2 ]Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK
                [3 ]Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
                [4 ]Division of Physical Biochemistry, National Institute for Medical Research, London NW7 1AA, UK
                [5 ]Anne McLaren Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author ggentsc@ 123456nimr.mrc.ac.uk
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author director@ 123456nimr.mrc.ac.uk
                Article
                S2211-1247(13)00436-1
                10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.012
                3791401
                24055059
                40fc973c-2c22-4813-bc94-91a0c5b70365
                © 2013 The Authors

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 3 May 2013
                : 11 July 2013
                : 6 August 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article